• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech

    Assembly & Automation Experts Share Thoughts on Medtech Trends

    Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics

    The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?

    Preserve and Protect: Sustainability Initiatives for Medtech Manufacturing
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    Beckman Coulter Helping Labs Comply With Annex 1 Regulation

    FDA Clears MeMed BV Direct From Whole Blood

    Biostrap Debuts Tool to Measure Stress Resilience, Heart Rate Variability

    EndoTheia Announces Positive Study Results for Endoscopic Surgery Device

    Abbott Completes Acquisition of Bigfoot Biomedical
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech

    Assembly & Automation Experts Share Thoughts on Medtech Trends

    Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics

    The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?

    Preserve and Protect: Sustainability Initiatives for Medtech Manufacturing
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Medtech’s Most Powerful M&A Drivers

    The Link Between Medtech and Connected Medical Devices

    Is the FTC Partly Responsible for Muted M&A Activity?

    Holistic Risk Management: Navigating the Future’s Uncertainties

    Defining End of Life for Medical Devices
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    Cirtec Medical

    Johari Digital Healthcare Ltd.

    Arthur G. Russell Co. Inc., The

    Medbio LLC

    JBC Technologies
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    A One-Stop-Shop, Turnkey Solution Is Paramount for Success

    How Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Are Revolutionizing the Medical Device Industry

    Medical Device Commercialization: It’s What, Not When, to Transfer to Manufacturing

    How In Silico Simulations Can Slash Medical Device Development Risk

    The Top 7 AI Applications Transforming Medical Device Manufacturing
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    Cirtec Medical

    Johari Digital Healthcare Ltd.

    Arthur G. Russell Co. Inc., The

    Medbio LLC

    JBC Technologies
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    3D Printing: Separating Fantasy from Reality in Medical Device Development

    3D-printed models are excellent tools for trying out different aesthetic approaches, and can be key in both human factors and preliminary market studies.

    3D Printing: Separating Fantasy from Reality in Medical Device Development
    Peggy Fasano, Chief Operating Officer, Boulder iQ09.10.21
    Fantasy: Your startup company’s initial fundraising efforts were successful, and you are making admirable progress on your product concept with the seed funding you received. A smart engineer spends several hours with a CAD drawing program, sends the resulting file to a 3D printer, and comes up with a slick-looking model for an upcoming presentation. The model awes investors, and they clamor to get a jump on the competition by suggesting (demanding) you move quickly into production.

    Reality: Today, it’s very possible for a person skilled at using a computer-aided design program to produce something flashy to show investors. It works well for that purpose. But in any industry, developing a 3D model is a very different operation from developing a product that is ready for market launch. In the medical device industry, the differences between a prototype and a saleable product are much greater, more significant, and have much larger consequences.

    The Pareto Principle
    The Pareto Principle states, for many outcomes, about 80 percent of consequences come from 20 percent of causes. Startup medical product companies can interpret the principle as, “It will look like you’re 80 percent of the way done, when you’re really only 20 percent of the way there.” The availability of 3D printed models has made the Pareto Principle a great deal more relevant in the industry.

    Creating an impressive concept model is a terrific milestone in product development—in the proper context. 3D-printed models are excellent tools for trying out different aesthetic approaches, and can be key in both human factors and preliminary market studies. The advent of 3D printing has made it possible to create several variations of a product for usability engineering sessions and focus groups, for instance.

    If your audience—investors or others—understands the 3D-printed model they are admiring is only for visualization purposes, proof of concept, and early-stage testing, 3D has a well-earned place in your business. If there is any chance your audience does not understand the context, they may well assume the product is close to production, given the finished look a 3D model can present. For medical devices, this lack of understanding can easily turn into disappointment and frustration, and lead to significant management and funding consequences.

    The Inherent Problems with Production
    Many medical device companies try to move directly into production with 3D-printed parts to accelerate the time to market and avoid upfront costs with injection molding. A good grasp and appreciation of the issues in doing so will save resources in every way.

    Biocompatibility
    If you completed all your biocompatibility testing on a 3D-printed product and now need to move to injection molding, you will most likely need to repeat the testing. Biocompatibility testing is evaluating the manufacturing process as well as the material. If you change the manufacturing process significantly, you will likely need to redo some of the biocompatibility testing. The same concept applies to shifting to different 3D-printed materials and processes.

    Volume Production
    For a small number of products or parts, 3D printing is quick and relatively inexpensive. So, for needs of 10 or 20 units, it may be a great tool. It is not economical, however, for higher volumes. Once the volume needs increase to a few hundred, 3D printing is likely not the best option. If your product needs to be sterile, you’ll need to complete a shelf-life study and a sterilization validation, which, depending on your sample sizes, may require hundreds of units just to complete these studies.

    In addition, injection molding and other manufacturing techniques are much more cost effective once the initial investment of the molds has been made. For example, the parts cost for a 3D-printed part for a sterile, disposable product might be $5. An injection molding tool for relatively small volumes (e.g., good for up to 100,000 units) might cost $20,000. If you need 500 pieces to get through all the testing and into production, the cost with 3D printing would be $2,500 (500 x $5). Next up is biocompatibility testing, which can cost $10,000 to $40,000. Quick-turn ethylene oxide sterilization validation would add another $15,000. Packaging and shipping testing, including shelf-life testing, can cost $5,000 to $10,000. It adds up quickly.

    So, with 3D printing, it will cost $2,500 for the parts, and between $30,000 and $65,000 for the full set of qualification tests, along with a $5 parts cost. Later, when volumes dictate it’s time to transition to injection molding, you will need to repeat the biocompatibility testing (again at a cost of up to $40,000).

    In contrast, if you were to invest $20,000 for injection molding at the beginning of the project, the per-unit parts cost could realistically be about 25 cents (or less). You’d then effectively be paying for the tooling in the first 5,000 parts. Then, there is one set of testing—nothing to redo.

    Sterility Requirements
    If the product is a sterile one with which a patient may come into contact, the product must be robust enough to endure a sterilization process. For a plastic 3D-printed part, you will have to ensure the sterilization process does not degrade or effect the part. (Ethylene oxide is usually the best sterilization option for a 3D-printed plastic part.) The process to achieve the sterilization validation is usually relatively expensive and time-consuming, and even then, not all 3D materials can pass the required tests.

    Electronics Needs
    If the product is an electronic device that will require an enclosure, the material for the enclosure must meet electrical and fire safety standards. Not all 3D-printing materials will be able to meet these requirements. And because the required testing is expensive and time-consuming, developers usually find it makes sense to conduct the testing only with the final product configuration in which materials are certified to meet UL 94-V0 or equivalent standards.

    The Role of DFM
    Medical device developers are well-advised to perform Design for Manufacturing (DFM) before moving into production. This additional design step ensures the product can be manufactured reliably, will function as intended per the requirements, and can be manufactured at the desired volume and cost targets. A 3D-printed model developed for proof of concept can have significant changes in its design for manufacturing.

    If going the DFM route, a developer should think about the manufacturing and assembling techniques, the desired volumes over the next several years, how much the product will be used (including whether it is disposable), and the target cost of goods. Design with manufacturing in mind includes designing for moldability by incorporating drafts, material shrinkage, and uniform wall thicknesses. The design should also include tolerances and manufacturing considerations in the 3D-print files, Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GDT) techniques, and worst-case stack-up calculations to ensure interchangeable parts.

    A word of caution: Remember 3D printers can print almost anything. That doesn’t mean the result will be suitable for manufacturing. They may print with parts that have undercuts, which could never be removed from a production injection mold, and shapes that can’t be reproduced by any other means than 3D printing.

    Best Practices
    The good news is there are ways to use 3D printing to edge closer to a producible design. The key is in careful planning, keeping the final production process in mind in the early stages of design.

    Establish Realistic Expectations
    If using 3D printing anywhere within the development process, it’s wise to set expectations at the beginning. Don’t let an executive or an investor get carried away with the look and feel of a good model.

    Make a Development Plan
    Keep in mind the old adage, “People don’t plan to fail; they fail to plan.” Some (or many) people involved in a product’s creation may not understand all the steps involved in getting a product to market. When developing a medical device, there is a long way to go between concept and market launch, involving design, engineering, quality assurance, manufacturing, sterilization (if needed), and packaging.

    Regulatory compliance, in particular, can take substantial time and resources. Steps will include gathering user input, performing risk and hazard assessment, developing design controls, conducting design reviews, building a Design History File, conducting verification and validation testing, conducting standards compliance testing, and transferring to manufacturing (including creation of the Device Master Record). While methods to streamline the process exist and can help tremendously, be sure the plan includes well-thought-out timelines and alternatives.

    Iterate
    As perfect as the 3D model looks, and as much confidence exists that development and manufacturing will be spot-on the first time, it almost never happens that way. Plan on iterations, and include them in your plan and timelines.

    Communicate
    Once a realistic schedule has been developed—one that includes contingencies and iterations—be sure to communicate it broadly, and explain it clearly, concisely, and accurately to all audiences. Those may include, but not be limited to, investors, employees, and senior leadership.

    Conclusion
    The Pareto Principle has existed since Joseph Juran, an engineer and management consultant, generalized the findings of Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto in 1941. The availability and growth of 3D printing just makes it more commonplace in medical device development. While 3D printing is a fantastic tool for quick models and to test concepts, in the world of medical devices, there’s a big gap between fantasy and reality. Understanding how, when, and where to incorporate 3D printing into device development can make the difference between market success and failure. 


    Peggy Fasano is the chief operating officer of Boulder iQ in Boulder, Colo. She is an expert in product development, project management, and engineering within the medical device and biotech industries. She has held the positions of senior consultant with Deloitte Consulting, managing director of the Deming Center Venture Fund, product development and engineer consultant for Boulder BioMed, and project manager and mechanical engineer for Sophono Inc. She also has worked as a mechanical engineer and project manager at Polestar Technologies. Fasano holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Tufts University and an M.B.A. from the University of Colorado. She can be reached at peggy.fasano@boulderiq.com.
    Related Searches
    • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Related Knowledge Center
    • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      Loading, Please Wait..

      Trending
      • Diabetes Innovation: MIT Engineers Unveil Implantable Device With Oxygen Factory
      • A New Approach To Post-Market Surveillance
      • Medtronic Obtains EU Nod For Simplera CGM
      • Danaher Names New Environmental And Applied Solutions Company Veralto
      • Hologic, Bayer Team Up For Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
      Breaking News
      • Beckman Coulter Helping Labs Comply With Annex 1 Regulation
      • FDA Clears MeMed BV Direct From Whole Blood
      • Biostrap Debuts Tool to Measure Stress Resilience, Heart Rate Variability
      • EndoTheia Announces Positive Study Results for Endoscopic Surgery Device
      • Abbott Completes Acquisition of Bigfoot Biomedical
      View Breaking News >
      CURRENT ISSUE

      September 2023

      • Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech
      • Medical Device Industry Experts' Thought on Assembly & Automation
      • Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics
      • The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?
      • View More >

      Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
      You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms And Conditions
      • Contact Us

      follow us

      Subscribe
      Nutraceuticals World

      Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

      GOED Releases Sustainability Report for Omega-3s Industry
      ABC’s Journal HerbalGram Celebrates 40th Anniversary
      Curcumin May Be As Effective as PPI for Indigestion
      Coatings World

      Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

      Nouryon Manufacturing Network Transitions to 100% Electricity From Renewable Sources in Brazil
      Jay Doubman Named President and CEO of ICP Group
      “MyCarbonFootprint”: BASF Launches Dashboard for Sustainable Procurement
      Medical Product Outsourcing

      Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

      Beckman Coulter Helping Labs Comply With Annex 1 Regulation
      FDA Clears MeMed BV Direct From Whole Blood
      Biostrap Debuts Tool to Measure Stress Resilience, Heart Rate Variability
      Contract Pharma

      Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

      Eftilagimod Cleared for Clinical Trial Use in the UK
      Veranova Names William Sanders Global VP of Chemical Development Ops
      Chime, Panolos Partner to Advance Multi-specific Therapeutic Proteins
      Beauty Packaging

      Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

      Hailey Bieber's Rhode Expands Into Makeup
      Avon Enters Retail Partnership with Superdrug
      IT Award Winners Announced at MakeUp in NY
      Happi

      Latest Breaking News From Happi

      Divi Expands in Stores at Ulta Beauty Tripling Footprint
      Huda Beauty Adds Easy Bake and Snatch Pressed Brightening and Setting Powder
      Detergent for Baby Bottles Contains an Odor Absorber
      Ink World

      Latest Breaking News From Ink World

      INKBANK Lays Foundation for Science and Technology Park
      Successful Labelexpo Europe 2023 Concludes in Brussels
      Recyclable, Deinkable Stand-Up Pouch Wins Gold
      Label & Narrow Web

      Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

      Flexo Wash to exhibit at FTA Fall Technical Conference
      Recyclable, deinkable stand-up pouch wins Gold in Germany
      Elkem highlights thermal protection and battery assembly products
      Nonwovens Industry

      Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

      Lenzing Earns EU Ecolabel at Indonesian Plant
      Albis Completes Work On Extra Wide Carding, Blending Line
      Ahlstrom Launches Nonwoven Laundry Care Product
      Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Anika Releases RevoMotion Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty System
      Exactech's Activit-E Polyethylene OK'ed for Vantage Total Ankle
      Tyber Nets Several Regulatory Nods for K-Wires, Steinmann Pins
      Printed Electronics Now

      Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

      HMI Specialist RAFI Acquires Xymox Technologies Inc.
      Infineon Heads EECONE European Research Project
      NXP Honored with Prestigious Automotive Awards

      Copyright © 2023 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

      AD BLOCKER DETECTED

      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


      FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login