• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    MPO's 2023 Medtech Supply Chain Survey

    Exceeding Medical Device Extrusion Expectations

    Medical Device Micromolders Discuss the 'Minor Details'

    Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech

    Assembly & Automation Experts Share Thoughts on Medtech Trends
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    AIRAmed’s AIRAscore Cleared by FDA

    Dexcom, RxFood Ally for AI-Based Nutrition, Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management

    Sharon Levita Joins ForSight Robotics as CFO

    PECA Labs Names Three New Board Members

    Astellas, Eko Health Collaborate on Heart Failure Detection Tech
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    MPO's 2023 Medtech Supply Chain Survey

    Exceeding Medical Device Extrusion Expectations

    Medical Device Micromolders Discuss the 'Minor Details'

    Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech

    Assembly & Automation Experts Share Thoughts on Medtech Trends
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Back to School for Medical Device Cybersecurity Training

    Driving Clinical Trial Excellence to Help Study Teams Run a Faster Relay Race

    Medtech’s Supply Chain: From Disruption to Opportunity

    Are Medtech’s Mega-Deals Gone For Good?

    Will a Skilling Gap Hinder Organizational Readiness for Medtech’s New Age of AI?
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    JBC Technologies

    Halkey-Roberts Corporation

    Providence Enterprise USA Inc.

    Medbio LLC

    Cirtec Medical
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    A One-Stop-Shop, Turnkey Solution Is Paramount for Success

    How Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Are Revolutionizing the Medical Device Industry

    Medical Device Commercialization: It’s What, Not When, to Transfer to Manufacturing

    How In Silico Simulations Can Slash Medical Device Development Risk

    The Top 7 AI Applications Transforming Medical Device Manufacturing
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    JBC Technologies

    Halkey-Roberts Corporation

    Providence Enterprise USA Inc.

    Medbio LLC

    Cirtec Medical
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    Understanding the Competitive Advantages of Full Service Outsourcing in the Make vs. Buy Decision

    ...

    Understanding the Competitive Advantages of Full Service Outsourcing in the Make vs. Buy Decision
    Tom Williams, General Manager, Millstone Medical Outsourcing05.01.19
    Across industries, managers and leaders often struggle to determine whether handling capabilities in-house or outsourcing them is financially and operationally advantageous for their companies. Put more simply, this struggle can be expressed as: “We need X. Should I make it or buy it?”

    While the make vs. buy conundrum is central to many types of businesses, competition ratchets up the pressure. The more competitive a market is, the greater the pressure is on a company to find and maintain an edge. As the medical device industry is fiercely competitive, quality, safety, and velocity are all critical to profitability and growth. For these reasons, it’s more important than ever to make the right decision when it comes to in-house production or outsourcing. But, where does a firm start?

    Labor Costs
    Making the best decision isn’t necessarily straightforward. For instance, while space or capacity may exist, it does not mean a company shouldn’t outsource. To determine which option offers advantages, internal costs and geographic cost pressures need to first be clearly understood.

    In any business, labor costs can be variable, subject to both internal and external pressures. Geography and cost of living, supply and demand, the state of the hiring market, and the skills required can all affect labor rates. Locations in or near areas with a higher cost of living can drive up labor costs.

    Also, over time, some of these pressures may shift. As the hiring market becomes more competitive, for instance, a shortage of skilled candidates may drive up labor costs. Paying more for labor will, of course, increase costs and reduce profitability.

    Calculating True Internal Costs: The Full-Burden Labor Rate
    Everything undertaken as a business incurs both direct and indirect costs. With an accurate calculation of the full-burden labor rate—which represents the true internal cost—one can understand how and when labor costs are in a company’s favor and when they reduce profitability. That clarity can help determine whether the best allocation of resources is to keep capabilities in-house or outsource them.

    Calculating the full-burden labor rate starts by adding together the cost of all employees associated with production, including wages and costs of temporary and permanent staff; associated costs incurred by IT personnel, operations, and quality assurance staff; associated maintenance staff costs; and costs for proportional time accrued by management/other leadership.

    Once those costs are added together, the hours associated with delivering each capability can be determined. Knowing hours and internal cost can enable direct comparisons between in-house and outsourcing to be made—and help to avoid the three myths of capabilities decisions.

    Since many companies do not have an accurate calculation of their full-burden labor rate, they can fall into common traps when it comes to decisions on functions such as cleaning, validated packaging, field returns, or loaner kit management.

    Myth #1: If It’s Done In-House, It’s Free
    Nothing is ever free. A company incurs direct and indirect costs every day, so be wary of falling into the trap of only costing out the labor directly associated with a particular function, as that does not represent the entire cost.

    Consider the example of handling cleaning and packaging in-house. Although it may seem that only personnel associated with the cleanroom are incurring cost, that isn’t the case. Cleanrooms require dedicated space, incur utility costs, involve quality and maintenance staff, and even take time and attention from management. It’s easy to see how this can seem “free,” but it actually comes at a high cost when the full-burden labor rate is determined. Once the cost of the cleanroom at an hourly or daily basis can be calculated, the best business decision—in-house or outsourcing—can be made.

    Myth #2: If I Have Space or Capacity, I Should Do It In-House
    Consider the in-house decision from another angle. Let’s say the space for a cleanroom exists, but additional labor will be required for the in-house option to be feasible. Temporary staff is brought in to augment capacity. Does the decision, however, take into account the total combined overhead, indirect, and fixed costs? Can capacity flex with demand? At the end of the day, does it make financial sense to do so?

    Even if a company is large, resources—like time, staff, and budget—are finite. Growth comes through product development and a bigger client base along with ever-increasing operational efficiency. When done well, the results include higher profits and access to more working capital.

    If everything is accomplished in-house, employees cannot possibly focus on—and prioritize—core competencies like product design and marketing—the fundamental drivers of growth. It’s about opportunity cost: spending time and resources on areas where the company’s employees are inefficient or lack true expertise ends up detracting from established competencies and affecting the bottom line.

    Myth #3: All Outsourcing Decisions Are the Same
    Once outsourcing has been determined to be operationally and financially advantageous, it’s important to resist falling for the final myth—any vendor will do. Not all outsourcing decisions are equal.

    Broadly speaking, there are two choices when it comes to outsourcing. The first is to choose an expert partner that knows and understands the industry and has a proven track record of success. The second is to try to find efficiency with a current vendor; for example, allowing a vendor that produces product to bid on packaging it, too. While it’s tempting in this example to consider the idea that a product will be complete when it arrives at the finished goods warehouse and costs reduced, the firm may be risking more than it saves.

    The most important priority is getting to market safely, so patients’ lives can be improved, the R&D investment can be recouped, and the business expanded. If a product can’t be brought to market safely, the company can’t realize the main priority. An expert partner that has a sole focus on outsourced capabilities offers an advantage—an independent source ensuring cleaning, packaging, or other outsourced tasks are consistently accomplished correctly. To illustrate, if one was writing an academic article, would the author want the publisher to also be the fact checker? An independent source can provide assurance and verification that increases confidence and reliability in the product, its safety, and its quality.

    Six Advantages of Full-Service Outsourcing
    Not all expert outsourcing partners are able to address all needs; not all outsourcing partners are full-service firms. When selecting a full-service outsourcing partner that can provide all post-manufacturing and aftermarket services, scale, efficiency, expertise, and access to quality processes are unlocked, which can result in fantastic growth.

    The right partner brings established and efficient systems, outside talent, and perspective that can, in the long term, drive down fixed costs while augmenting or shifting capabilities currently handled in-house.

    1. Optimal allocation of resources—Outsourcing can help a company flex with peak and unanticipated demand without increasing fixed costs or adding to headcount. Scale up and down as need and demand dictate.

    2. Lower cash investment—Outsourcing can help a firm make better use of its resources. For instance, turning over loaner kits faster can help drive down the inventory footprint, enabling more surgeries to be supported with fewer kits overall. Optimizing inventory can help free up more working capital to reinvest in product development and innovation.

    3. More nimble response to demand—With outsourcing, a company can extend its daily shipping window, for example, without incurring overtime. Handling a larger number of cases—again with optimization of inventory—can help drive the business’ volume and velocity.

    4. Expertise that accelerates success—Consider how an expert outsourcing partner can help a firm achieve success more quickly without sacrificing quality or safety. For instance, use outsourcing package design and validation as an example. Choosing the right partner can help a company avoid pitfalls that may extend the validation timeframe and, ultimately, slow the product launch. In this case, as with other outsourced capabilities, true expertise covers not only how to design a package that effects an aseptic transfer into a surgical suite and a patient, but also how to handle distribution testing and accelerated aging testing to demonstrate safety and compliance without failures or setbacks.

    5. Confidence in quality and safety—A full-service outsourcing partner will have a demonstrated track record of success across multiple capabilities. Those firms that adhere to the highest standards for quality and safety will truly embrace a commitment to the patient. By providing industry perspective from experience with other device manufacturers, such a partner will be able to provide guidance on the latest and best practices.

    6. Freedom to focus—Arguably, the greatest benefit of full-service outsourcing is the freedom the right partnership provides. Remember, any company’s staff, time, and budget are finite. Outsourcing allows companies to focus on their core competencies of research, product development, and marketing; pursuing these successfully is what ultimately ignites growth for the business.
    At first, the make vs. buy decision can seem simple if one falls for the common myths. Yet, simply having the space or capacity does not mean a company should handle all capabilities in-house. Correctly calculating and factoring in the full-burden labor rate will help one understand when outsourcing key capabilities is the most effective allocation of resources.

    Conclusion
    The right partnership with a full-service outsourcing provider offers an array of advantages for medical device companies. Those advantages include established processes, efficient systems, and labor that can flex with peak or unanticipated demand. Other benefits include the guidance to optimize inventory, a reduction of cash investment, and time to market optimization—all while preserving quality and safety.
    Clarity with regard to costs can help executives make the smartest decision when it comes to the make vs. buy question. That accuracy can help them decide if they keep processes in-house, or if they should shift to a full-service partner to increase velocity and ignite growth. 


    Tom Williams joined Millstone in 2008 and has managed its packaging facility in Fall River, Mass., and loaner kit and distribution facility in Memphis, Tenn. Williams works closely with customers to develop new service offerings and facilitate speed and efficiency to market. He received a bachelor of science degree from UWIC and an MBA from Babson College.
    Related Searches
    • quality
    • design
    • cleaning
    • market
    Related Knowledge Center
    • Contract Manufacturing
    Suggested For You
    Simplexity Product Development Inc. Simplexity Product Development Inc.
    Beaumont Beaumont
    Kapstone Medical Kapstone Medical
    Taking the Waste Out of Product Development Taking the Waste Out of Product Development
    Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project? Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project?
    Prototype to win Prototype to win
    Ten Reasons to Stop using Excel for Product Development Ten Reasons to Stop using Excel for Product Development
    Why Big Companies With Internal Labs Should Outsource Testing Why Big Companies With Internal Labs Should Outsource Testing
    Help Wanted Help Wanted
    Connected R&D Connected R&D
    Medical Device Machining: A Dialogue with Laser Light Technologies Medical Device Machining: A Dialogue with Laser Light Technologies
    Smooth Operator: Addressing Machining Smooth Operator: Addressing Machining's Talent Gap
    The Benefits of a World Class Quality Culture on Defect Elimination and Risk Mitigation The Benefits of a World Class Quality Culture on Defect Elimination and Risk Mitigation
    Cirtec Medical Aquires Metrigraphics Cirtec Medical Aquires Metrigraphics
    Mack Molding Promotes Business Development Director to Top Sales Role Mack Molding Promotes Business Development Director to Top Sales Role

    Related Buyers Guide Companies

    • Simplexity Product Development Inc.

      ...
      Dorota Shortell, CEO 09.01.23

    • Beaumont

      Beaumont

      ...
      Eliana Pietras, Marketing Communications Lead 11.30.22

    • Kapstone Medical

      ...
      Justin Rowland, Director of Business Development 11.13.20


    • R&D & Design
      Taking the Waste Out of Product Development

      Taking the Waste Out of Product Development

      ...
      Ron Estes , VP Operations, Estes Design and Manufacturing 05.01.19

    • Contract Manufacturing | R&D & Design

      Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project?

      ...

    Loading, Please Wait..

    Trending
    • A New Approach To Post-Market Surveillance
    • Danaher Names New Environmental And Applied Solutions Company Veralto
    • Diabetes Innovation: MIT Engineers Unveil Implantable Device With Oxygen Factory
    • FDA Clears LiveMetric's Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Tech
    • Cochlear Implant Study Underway At Mayo Clinic
    Breaking News
    • AIRAmed’s AIRAscore Cleared by FDA
    • Dexcom, RxFood Ally for AI-Based Nutrition, Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management
    • Sharon Levita Joins ForSight Robotics as CFO
    • PECA Labs Names Three New Board Members
    • Astellas, Eko Health Collaborate on Heart Failure Detection Tech
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    September 2023

    • Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech
    • Medical Device Industry Experts' Thought on Assembly & Automation
    • Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics
    • The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?
    • View More >

    Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
    You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms And Conditions
    • Contact Us

    follow us

    Subscribe
    Nutraceuticals World

    Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

    CRN Files Petition with FTC For Clarity on Health Products Compliance Guidance
    Vitafoods Europe Relocates to Barcelona Starting 2025
    GOED Releases Sustainability Report for Omega-3s Industry
    Coatings World

    Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

    Sherwin-Williams Introduces High-Flexibility Body Filler
    Axalta’s Brian Berube to Retire
    Masco Corporation Names Richard Westenberg VP, CFO
    Medical Product Outsourcing

    Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

    AIRAmed’s AIRAscore Cleared by FDA
    Dexcom, RxFood Ally for AI-Based Nutrition, Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management
    Sharon Levita Joins ForSight Robotics as CFO
    Contract Pharma

    Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

    Valneva Signs $32M IXIARO Supply Pact with U.S. Government
    Charnwood Molecular Rebrands to Charnwood Discovery
    Pierre Fabre, Vernalis Enter Oncology Drug Discovery Alliance
    Beauty Packaging

    Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

    Bluebird and Pact Collective Partner to Drive Beauty Industry Toward Circularity
    Groupe Pochet Celebrates 400th Anniversary
    Ulta Beauty Launches Initiative to Spark National Conversation About Joy
    Happi

    Latest Breaking News From Happi

    Dr. Forhair Announces US In-Store Launch of Best-Selling Hair Loss Shampoo
    Lipoid Kosmetik’s Mountain Tea Pro Wins BSB Innovation Award
    Attitude’s 'Paper Beats Plastic' Campaign Takes Over Los Angeles
    Ink World

    Latest Breaking News From Ink World

    Tetra Pak Joins Earthquake Relief Efforts in Morocco
    Packaging Printing Market Worth $433.4B by 2025: MarketsandMarkets
    Cooper Watson Acquires Tower Products
    Label & Narrow Web

    Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

    Bobst to 'unwrap the future of flexible packaging' at open house
    IDENTCO brings new automated wire marking system to Mexico
    Maan Engineering chooses Vetaphone for linerless labels
    Nonwovens Industry

    Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

    Weekly Recap: Soft N' Dry Seeks to Expand Private Label Roll Out, Albis Completes Work on Line
    Lenzing Earns EU Ecolabel at Indonesian Plant
    Albis Completes Work On Extra Wide Carding, Blending Line
    Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Bone Health Technologies Adds Two New Board Directors
    MicroPort Orthopedics Announces Agenda & Speakers for Its Global Medial-Pivot Symposium
    Study Reveals Discovery of Unique Vertebral Stem Cells
    Printed Electronics Now

    Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

    LG Display Expands IT Industry Presence
    First Solar Breaks Ground on $1.1B, 3.5 GW Louisiana Manufacturing Facility
    HID to Showcase Future-Proof Solutions at GITEX 2023

    Copyright © 2023 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

    AD BLOCKER DETECTED

    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
    Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


    FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login