• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure

    OEMs Are Demanding Designs that Challenge Suppliers

    Diabetes Technology Manufacturers Seemingly on a Sugar Rush

    Post-Pandemic Partnerships: A Full-Service Outsourcing Discussion

    Discovering the Value of Surface Treatments and Coatings for Medtech
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    MPO's Most-Read Stories This Week—May 28

    New Breast Implant Surgery Guidelines to Enhance Patient Safety

    Rhythm Management Group Debuts RhythmSynergy Tech Platform

    FDA Approves Trial Completion for Virtual Incision's MIRA Platform

    Thermo Fisher Scientific, Matrix Clinical Trials Enhance Research Solutions
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure

    OEMs Are Demanding Designs that Challenge Suppliers

    Diabetes Technology Manufacturers Seemingly on a Sugar Rush

    Post-Pandemic Partnerships: A Full-Service Outsourcing Discussion

    Discovering the Value of Surface Treatments and Coatings for Medtech
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Injecting Neurostimulators into Blood Vessels (We Swear, It’s Not Sci-Fi)

    Understanding the Costs of Care in the OR

    Sick of Being Sick: Pandemic Fatigue Flares at AAOS

    Managing Critical Healthcare Supply Chains in Turbulent Times

    To Drive Value, Human Capital Leaders Turn to Outsourced Solutions
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    Trademark Plastics Inc.

    Cirtec Medical

    Arthur G. Russell Co. Inc., The

    Fusion Biotec Inc.

    Concise Engineering
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    3D Printing in Dental Prosthodontics, Orthodontics, and Surgery

    What New Tech Can Improve Your Medical Manufacturing Plant?

    Why Medical Device Firms Must Navigate the Muddy Waters of ESG Requirements

    Medical Device Servicing vs. Remanufacturing

    Digital Marketplaces for Medical Equipment Come of Age
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    Trademark Plastics Inc.

    Cirtec Medical

    Arthur G. Russell Co. Inc., The

    Fusion Biotec Inc.

    Concise Engineering
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    Understanding the Competitive Advantages of Full Service Outsourcing in the Make vs. Buy Decision

    ...

    Understanding the Competitive Advantages of Full Service Outsourcing in the Make vs. Buy Decision
    Related CONTENT
    • Beaumont
    • Kapstone Medical
    • Simplexity Product Development Inc.
    • Taking the Waste Out of Product Development
    • Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project?
    Tom Williams, General Manager, Millstone Medical Outsourcing05.01.19
    Across industries, managers and leaders often struggle to determine whether handling capabilities in-house or outsourcing them is financially and operationally advantageous for their companies. Put more simply, this struggle can be expressed as: “We need X. Should I make it or buy it?”

    While the make vs. buy conundrum is central to many types of businesses, competition ratchets up the pressure. The more competitive a market is, the greater the pressure is on a company to find and maintain an edge. As the medical device industry is fiercely competitive, quality, safety, and velocity are all critical to profitability and growth. For these reasons, it’s more important than ever to make the right decision when it comes to in-house production or outsourcing. But, where does a firm start?

    Labor Costs
    Making the best decision isn’t necessarily straightforward. For instance, while space or capacity may exist, it does not mean a company shouldn’t outsource. To determine which option offers advantages, internal costs and geographic cost pressures need to first be clearly understood.

    In any business, labor costs can be variable, subject to both internal and external pressures. Geography and cost of living, supply and demand, the state of the hiring market, and the skills required can all affect labor rates. Locations in or near areas with a higher cost of living can drive up labor costs.

    Also, over time, some of these pressures may shift. As the hiring market becomes more competitive, for instance, a shortage of skilled candidates may drive up labor costs. Paying more for labor will, of course, increase costs and reduce profitability.

    Calculating True Internal Costs: The Full-Burden Labor Rate
    Everything undertaken as a business incurs both direct and indirect costs. With an accurate calculation of the full-burden labor rate—which represents the true internal cost—one can understand how and when labor costs are in a company’s favor and when they reduce profitability. That clarity can help determine whether the best allocation of resources is to keep capabilities in-house or outsource them.

    Calculating the full-burden labor rate starts by adding together the cost of all employees associated with production, including wages and costs of temporary and permanent staff; associated costs incurred by IT personnel, operations, and quality assurance staff; associated maintenance staff costs; and costs for proportional time accrued by management/other leadership.

    Once those costs are added together, the hours associated with delivering each capability can be determined. Knowing hours and internal cost can enable direct comparisons between in-house and outsourcing to be made—and help to avoid the three myths of capabilities decisions.

    Since many companies do not have an accurate calculation of their full-burden labor rate, they can fall into common traps when it comes to decisions on functions such as cleaning, validated packaging, field returns, or loaner kit management.

    Myth #1: If It’s Done In-House, It’s Free
    Nothing is ever free. A company incurs direct and indirect costs every day, so be wary of falling into the trap of only costing out the labor directly associated with a particular function, as that does not represent the entire cost.

    Consider the example of handling cleaning and packaging in-house. Although it may seem that only personnel associated with the cleanroom are incurring cost, that isn’t the case. Cleanrooms require dedicated space, incur utility costs, involve quality and maintenance staff, and even take time and attention from management. It’s easy to see how this can seem “free,” but it actually comes at a high cost when the full-burden labor rate is determined. Once the cost of the cleanroom at an hourly or daily basis can be calculated, the best business decision—in-house or outsourcing—can be made.

    Myth #2: If I Have Space or Capacity, I Should Do It In-House
    Consider the in-house decision from another angle. Let’s say the space for a cleanroom exists, but additional labor will be required for the in-house option to be feasible. Temporary staff is brought in to augment capacity. Does the decision, however, take into account the total combined overhead, indirect, and fixed costs? Can capacity flex with demand? At the end of the day, does it make financial sense to do so?

    Even if a company is large, resources—like time, staff, and budget—are finite. Growth comes through product development and a bigger client base along with ever-increasing operational efficiency. When done well, the results include higher profits and access to more working capital.

    If everything is accomplished in-house, employees cannot possibly focus on—and prioritize—core competencies like product design and marketing—the fundamental drivers of growth. It’s about opportunity cost: spending time and resources on areas where the company’s employees are inefficient or lack true expertise ends up detracting from established competencies and affecting the bottom line.

    Myth #3: All Outsourcing Decisions Are the Same
    Once outsourcing has been determined to be operationally and financially advantageous, it’s important to resist falling for the final myth—any vendor will do. Not all outsourcing decisions are equal.

    Broadly speaking, there are two choices when it comes to outsourcing. The first is to choose an expert partner that knows and understands the industry and has a proven track record of success. The second is to try to find efficiency with a current vendor; for example, allowing a vendor that produces product to bid on packaging it, too. While it’s tempting in this example to consider the idea that a product will be complete when it arrives at the finished goods warehouse and costs reduced, the firm may be risking more than it saves.

    The most important priority is getting to market safely, so patients’ lives can be improved, the R&D investment can be recouped, and the business expanded. If a product can’t be brought to market safely, the company can’t realize the main priority. An expert partner that has a sole focus on outsourced capabilities offers an advantage—an independent source ensuring cleaning, packaging, or other outsourced tasks are consistently accomplished correctly. To illustrate, if one was writing an academic article, would the author want the publisher to also be the fact checker? An independent source can provide assurance and verification that increases confidence and reliability in the product, its safety, and its quality.

    Six Advantages of Full-Service Outsourcing
    Not all expert outsourcing partners are able to address all needs; not all outsourcing partners are full-service firms. When selecting a full-service outsourcing partner that can provide all post-manufacturing and aftermarket services, scale, efficiency, expertise, and access to quality processes are unlocked, which can result in fantastic growth.

    The right partner brings established and efficient systems, outside talent, and perspective that can, in the long term, drive down fixed costs while augmenting or shifting capabilities currently handled in-house.

    1. Optimal allocation of resources—Outsourcing can help a company flex with peak and unanticipated demand without increasing fixed costs or adding to headcount. Scale up and down as need and demand dictate.

    2. Lower cash investment—Outsourcing can help a firm make better use of its resources. For instance, turning over loaner kits faster can help drive down the inventory footprint, enabling more surgeries to be supported with fewer kits overall. Optimizing inventory can help free up more working capital to reinvest in product development and innovation.

    3. More nimble response to demand—With outsourcing, a company can extend its daily shipping window, for example, without incurring overtime. Handling a larger number of cases—again with optimization of inventory—can help drive the business’ volume and velocity.

    4. Expertise that accelerates success—Consider how an expert outsourcing partner can help a firm achieve success more quickly without sacrificing quality or safety. For instance, use outsourcing package design and validation as an example. Choosing the right partner can help a company avoid pitfalls that may extend the validation timeframe and, ultimately, slow the product launch. In this case, as with other outsourced capabilities, true expertise covers not only how to design a package that effects an aseptic transfer into a surgical suite and a patient, but also how to handle distribution testing and accelerated aging testing to demonstrate safety and compliance without failures or setbacks.

    5. Confidence in quality and safety—A full-service outsourcing partner will have a demonstrated track record of success across multiple capabilities. Those firms that adhere to the highest standards for quality and safety will truly embrace a commitment to the patient. By providing industry perspective from experience with other device manufacturers, such a partner will be able to provide guidance on the latest and best practices.

    6. Freedom to focus—Arguably, the greatest benefit of full-service outsourcing is the freedom the right partnership provides. Remember, any company’s staff, time, and budget are finite. Outsourcing allows companies to focus on their core competencies of research, product development, and marketing; pursuing these successfully is what ultimately ignites growth for the business.
    At first, the make vs. buy decision can seem simple if one falls for the common myths. Yet, simply having the space or capacity does not mean a company should handle all capabilities in-house. Correctly calculating and factoring in the full-burden labor rate will help one understand when outsourcing key capabilities is the most effective allocation of resources.

    Conclusion
    The right partnership with a full-service outsourcing provider offers an array of advantages for medical device companies. Those advantages include established processes, efficient systems, and labor that can flex with peak or unanticipated demand. Other benefits include the guidance to optimize inventory, a reduction of cash investment, and time to market optimization—all while preserving quality and safety.
    Clarity with regard to costs can help executives make the smartest decision when it comes to the make vs. buy question. That accuracy can help them decide if they keep processes in-house, or if they should shift to a full-service partner to increase velocity and ignite growth. 


    Tom Williams joined Millstone in 2008 and has managed its packaging facility in Fall River, Mass., and loaner kit and distribution facility in Memphis, Tenn. Williams works closely with customers to develop new service offerings and facilitate speed and efficiency to market. He received a bachelor of science degree from UWIC and an MBA from Babson College.
    Related Searches
    • it
    • time to market
    • medical
    • guidance
    Related Knowledge Center
    • Contract Manufacturing
    Suggested For You
    Beaumont Beaumont
    Kapstone Medical Kapstone Medical
    Simplexity Product Development Inc. Simplexity Product Development Inc.
    Taking the Waste Out of Product Development Taking the Waste Out of Product Development
    Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project? Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project?
    Prototype to win Prototype to win
    Ten Reasons to Stop using Excel for Product Development Ten Reasons to Stop using Excel for Product Development
    Why Big Companies With Internal Labs Should Outsource Testing Why Big Companies With Internal Labs Should Outsource Testing
    Help Wanted Help Wanted
    Connected R&D Connected R&D
    Medical Device Machining: A Dialogue with Laser Light Technologies Medical Device Machining: A Dialogue with Laser Light Technologies
    Smooth Operator: Addressing Machining Smooth Operator: Addressing Machining's Talent Gap
    The Benefits of a World Class Quality Culture on Defect Elimination and Risk Mitigation The Benefits of a World Class Quality Culture on Defect Elimination and Risk Mitigation
    Cirtec Medical Aquires Metrigraphics Cirtec Medical Aquires Metrigraphics
    Mack Molding Promotes Business Development Director to Top Sales Role Mack Molding Promotes Business Development Director to Top Sales Role

    Related Content

    • Beaumont

      Beaumont

      ...
      Erica Mohney, Marketing Communications Lead 10.19.21

    • Kapstone Medical

      ...
      Justin Rowland, Director of Business Development 11.13.20

    • Simplexity Product Development Inc.

      ...
      Dorota Shortell, CEO 12.09.19


    • R&D & Design
      Taking the Waste Out of Product Development

      Taking the Waste Out of Product Development

      ...
      Ron Estes , VP Operations, Estes Design and Manufacturing 05.01.19

    • Contract Manufacturing | R&D & Design

      Offshore Manufacturing: Risky Business or the Right Choice for Your Project?

      ...


      Trending
      • 5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized The Healthcare Industry | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • FDA Clears Masimo's Neonatal RD SET Pulse Oximetry Sensors With Improved Accuracy Specifications | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • Medtronic, DaVita To Create New Kidney Care Firm | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • 7 Steps To Create Your Own Medical Device Marketing Plan | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • Rhythm Management Group Debuts RhythmSynergy Tech Platform | Medical Product Outsourcing
      Breaking News
      • MPO's Most-Read Stories This Week—May 28
      • New Breast Implant Surgery Guidelines to Enhance Patient Safety
      • Rhythm Management Group Debuts RhythmSynergy Tech Platform
      • FDA Approves Trial Completion for Virtual Incision's MIRA Platform
      • Thermo Fisher Scientific, Matrix Clinical Trials Enhance Research Solutions
      View Breaking News >
      CURRENT ISSUE

      May 2022

      • Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure
      • Contract Design for Medtech
      • Diabetes Medical Device Technology Update
      • Medtech Full-Service Outsourcing Q&A 2022

      Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
      You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms And Conditions
      • Contact Us

      follow us

      Subscribe
      Nutraceuticals World

      Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

      Thorne Relaunches Gut Health Test with Microbiome Wipe
      Alkemist Labs Announces Alkemist Assured Seal and Next Generation Transparency Reports
      GC Rieber Foundations Expand Philanthropic Efforts
      Coatings World

      Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

      Nippon Paint Automotive Americas Appoints Robert Angart CEO and President
      Sustainability, Economy are Focus of BCF’s Annual Conference
      Demand for Rhino Shield Increases
      Medical Product Outsourcing

      Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

      MPO's Most-Read Stories This Week—May 28
      New Breast Implant Surgery Guidelines to Enhance Patient Safety
      Rhythm Management Group Debuts RhythmSynergy Tech Platform
      Contract Pharma

      Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

      iECURE Enters Agreement with Center for Breakthrough Medicines
      CPDC Enters Clinical Manufacturing Deal with CellBion
      Olon to Build New R&D Center in Italy
      Beauty Packaging

      Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

      K-Beauty Brand Siita Shares Plastic Decomposition Technology with the Beauty Industry
      Shellworks Raises $6.2 Million in Seed Funding
      Ulta Beauty Reports Record First Quarter 2022 Results
      Happi

      Latest Breaking News From Happi

      Global Skincare Treatment Devices Market Expected to Grow at Over 11.5% CAGR Rate Through 2028
      Honeywell Addresses Critical Issues Such as Sustainability, Workforce Training and Digitalization
      Monat Global Wins Four Stevie Awards in the 20th Annual American Business Awards
      Ink World

      Latest Breaking News From Ink World

      Weekly Recap: Flint Group, New Inks from Siegwerk and Zeller+Gmelin Lead This Week’s News
      Orion to Finish Gas Black Expansion in Germany by Early 2023
      Richard Childress Racing Shows Off New Wraps for 2022 NASCAR Season
      Label & Narrow Web

      Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

      UPM Raflatac accelerates label growth with acquisition
      Labelexpo Asia 2022 postponed
      Teklynx software helps Top Clean Injection validate labels
      Nonwovens Industry

      Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

      Rael Raises $35M in Series B Funding
      Schobertechnologies Offers Rotary Web-fed Converting Solutions
      Thorne Relaunches Gut Health Test with Microbiome Wipe
      Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

      ODT's Most-Read Stories This Week—May 28
      Toetal Solutions Raises $1.02 Million in New Financing
      ManaMed's ManaSport Wearable Ultrasound Earns FDA Nod
      Printed Electronics Now

      Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

      Weekly Recap: OPV’s Future, Graphene Flagship and Japan Display Top This Week’s Stories
      SEMI Foundation Receives $1.5 Million Grant to Bolster Michigan’s Semiconductor Talent Pipeline
      onsemi Recognized by Fortune 500 for Its Transformation Journey

      Copyright © 2022 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

      AD BLOCKER DETECTED

      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


      FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login