• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure

    OEMs Are Demanding Designs that Challenge Suppliers

    Diabetes Technology Manufacturers Seemingly on a Sugar Rush

    Post-Pandemic Partnerships: A Full-Service Outsourcing Discussion

    Discovering the Value of Surface Treatments and Coatings for Medtech
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    Medtronic, DaVita to Create New Kidney Care Firm

    OmniGuide's RevoLix HTL Hybrid Thulium Laser OK'ed for BPH and Stone Treatments

    In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation Takes Effect

    Brian Case Appointed Chief Technology Officer at KORU Medical

    Solid Growth Expected for India's Medical Device Sector
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure

    OEMs Are Demanding Designs that Challenge Suppliers

    Diabetes Technology Manufacturers Seemingly on a Sugar Rush

    Post-Pandemic Partnerships: A Full-Service Outsourcing Discussion

    Discovering the Value of Surface Treatments and Coatings for Medtech
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Injecting Neurostimulators into Blood Vessels (We Swear, It’s Not Sci-Fi)

    Understanding the Costs of Care in the OR

    Sick of Being Sick: Pandemic Fatigue Flares at AAOS

    Managing Critical Healthcare Supply Chains in Turbulent Times

    To Drive Value, Human Capital Leaders Turn to Outsourced Solutions
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    Arthur G. Russell Co. Inc., The

    Cirtec Medical

    Trademark Plastics Inc.

    Xact Wire EDM Corp.

    Fusion Biotec Inc.
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    3D Printing in Dental Prosthodontics, Orthodontics, and Surgery

    What New Tech Can Improve Your Medical Manufacturing Plant?

    Why Medical Device Firms Must Navigate the Muddy Waters of ESG Requirements

    Medical Device Servicing vs. Remanufacturing

    Digital Marketplaces for Medical Equipment Come of Age
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    Arthur G. Russell Co. Inc., The

    Cirtec Medical

    Trademark Plastics Inc.

    Xact Wire EDM Corp.

    Fusion Biotec Inc.
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    Six Questions to Consider in Developing a Home Healthcare Device

    These design decisions stem from questions relative to in-home use and 60601-1-11 compliance.

    Six Questions to Consider in Developing a Home Healthcare Device
    Rachael Scott, Lead Electrical Engineer, Key Tech03.03.21
    Medical products are being challenged to meet rising demand for in-home treatment options, but the home is a unique space and requires careful planning. Home healthcare device design presents challenges relative to its in-clinic counterpart. The home introduces an uncontrolled environment with more variables and an unknown user. Further, designing to the 60601-1-11 Home Healthcare standard takes careful attention. This article highlights the steps we took to develop a body-worn therapeutic and accompanying console for home use.

    In-home design forces product designers to consider the extremes of the environment, the user, safety, and connectivity, which, for this project, called for different design requirements for the wearable and console. For this wearable device, we designed features that ensured position repeatability, user feedback, and robustness, while the console’s design reflected hardware and software features for preventing misuse and supporting cybersecurity, portability, and power. These design decisions stem from questions relative to in-home use and 60601-1-11 compliance.

    1. How big can the tethered console be for adequate home use?
    Considerations: Where/when does it need to be used? How often? Does a person need to carry it upstairs? Is it heavy enough to require a cart? How long will the cords be?

    For our product application, the user needed to be lying down during use of the system, which made a bedside or coffee table a viable platform for the console. This determination alone starts to constrict the device size and weight. Homes, unlike clinics, are not guaranteed to have elevators, laminate floors, or standardized surfaces, which required us to consider these unknowns carefully when weighing the device features with use cases.

    In terms of device size, smaller is not always better, but bigger certainly brings placement and transport challenges. For example, if we designed a small device, but the user had to put it on the floor, the device’s user interface (UI) might not be visible from the bed position. On the other end of the spectrum, if it was massive and hard to locate near the bed, it would be difficult to interact with during set-up. In the end, size reduction options were limited by internal hardware space claims, so we moved forward with a requirement that a table or surface must be available to place the console. We also pursued a design that included handles and weight maximums that ensured it could be carried by a single person.

    In 60601-1-11 terms, these considerations led to our definition of the console as “non-transit operable and portable” and the wearable as “non-transit operable and body-worn.” Of the classifications in 60601-1-11, our console and wearable were subjected to different mechanical stress tests based on the different intended uses. Lightweight body devices might see more human interaction, and thus are more likely to be dropped from six feet, whereas a console may be less likely to drop, but more damage could incur.

    2. Where is the nearest power outlet? What happens if power fails?
    Considerations: Does it require wall power? How far is the nearest outlet from the use location? What happens if the house loses power?

    The location of the console defined other power and portability constraints. The 60601-1-11 standard required us to evaluate the risk of power reliability and availability at the onset of electronics design. In balancing the device and usability needs, we determined a wall-powered console was appropriate. Unlike hospitals, homes are not necessarily protected by isolated power systems and are categorized as part of a public mains network. The 60601-1-11 standard requires all portable devices for home healthcare to be Class II internally powered. This can have profound implications on electrical safety architectures because it implies protective earth cannot be used as a method of protection. Power-quality concerns also affected the console design process in several ways, including additional risk analysis on patient safety due to loss of power, extra consideration of auditory alarms in addition to visual, and supplemental electromagnetic compatibility conducted immunity tests.

    3. Where will the device be stored and used?
    Considerations: Does the device need to work in the dead of winter in mountainous Colorado or in the raging summer in Arizona? What if the device is stored in the attic?

    It can be easy to lose appreciation of the consistent environment in clinic as designing a home device provides a new set of challenges. The 60601-1-11 standard expands the general standard environmental conditions to 5°C to 40°C, and 15 percent to 93 percent RH (relative humidity) versus 10°C to 40°C and 30 percent to 75 percent RH, respectively, for a hospital device. Both standards allow manufacturers to define smaller operating regions, but the product value will be affected if, for example, all of Southern California cannot use the device in the summer. To ensure safety at the temperature extremes, the console and wearable include redundant temperature monitoring circuitry and diagnostics to prevent use over a specific ambient or operating temperature.

    4. How could misuse result in harm to the patient?
    Considerations: What happens if the wrong person puts on the device? What if a person puts a wearable designed for the abdomen on their leg?

    The paradigm shift from a trained clinician to an average person is a significant consideration in designing in-home devices and a focus of the 60601-1-11 in-home healthcare collateral standard. Early usability analysis was crucial input for our in-home wearable in order to shape the physical form and system-user feedback. We considered wearable features that made it difficult to place in the incorrect location and complex feedback systems to verify and even adjust placement if necessary. Additionally, following 60601-1-11 guidance, we designed additional ingress protection on both the wearable and console to compensate for the increased risk of exposure to fluids. We also considered software controls that severely limited unwarranted access to the device, including complex cybersecurity techniques that included password-protected user interfaces. The feedback loop and device control are critically important for both patient safety and compliance for a therapeutic administered without oversight.

    5. How do you design a complex medical device for a non-medical professional?
    Considerations: How does the system show complex analyses in a simple form? What do you show the user, and how do you show it?

    Without a trained clinician to operate the system, the device must automate checks that would otherwise have been done manually. Specifically, the wearable must eliminate use errors wherever possible by design, and the console must detect and effectively communicate sometimes complex errors and instructions to the user. To ensure all errors that could cause unintended risk are detectable or preventable, significant work was required to assess usability of the device and necessary redundancy of software and hardware controls. The 60601-1-11 standard considers this unique requirement for an in-home device, and, for example, requires auditory alarms for all medium- and high-priority errors or issues.

    Home devices are expanding into a realm of complex therapeutics and diagnostics, opening questions about how to have a patient interpret device results. This adds a whole new dynamic to reducing complexity for user simplicity. Both the console and the wearable required complex algorithms and processing, distilled into simple feedback to the user. In our device, we found simple light and vibration were familiar during placement of the device, and additional device setup was best shown through a user touchscreen interface.

    6. How can the device design encourage or ensure patient compliance, and how are product successes and issues tracked?
    Considerations: How can the design promote compliance? How can troubleshooting be done with minimal inconvenience to the user? How can important use data be collected reliably and safely to understand product issues and identify potential areas of improvement?

    Another in-home development consideration involves designing the device to encourage correct usage and to simultaneously indicate when it is not being used properly. Without a clinician present during normal use, these burdens fall on the product, affecting everything from long-life component selection to the addition of secondary software modules, and to database and device connectivity features. The 60601-1-11 standard considers the need for in-home technical support and has requirements outside design specifics to ensure documentation, labels, and instructions adequately provide sufficient information for users.

    For our design, we considered the need to collect clinical data for initial device performance assessments. This exposed the possible need for a cloud database and significant cybersecurity design because it was not reasonable to assume regular access to local storage in devices across patients’ homes. In turn, this not only made us think about how the device logged data (i.e., WIFI interface) but what was logged (e.g., device actions, user actions, results, etc.). The goal is always to balance data storage and transmission requirements with the desire to be able to paint a picture of each use and understand how users can be inadvertently affecting the success of the device. It is critical for a device to consider these secondary users and what they need to access in order to ensure the safety and success of the product in the home marketplace.

    Conclusion
    The expansion of medical devices into the home offers huge opportunities for medical advancement. The implications of the added unknown user and uncontrolled environment require early risk and usability assessments to ensure the product is not only safe, but functional in the hands of an untrained user. Although the 60601-1-11 Home Healthcare collateral standard drives these key design decisions by establishing paths to assess the home’s added risk, it is up to designers to recognize the cascading impact of these unknowns and apply mitigations early for successful home healthcare product development. 


    Rachael Scott is a lead electrical engineer at Key Tech with six years of product development experience. She has been an electrical and system design lead on a number of medical designs, including large development in-vitro diagnostics and patient-care devices. Scott has experience architecting, designing, and testing complex devices relative to 60601 and 61010 general and collateral standards in various capacities including feasibility design, prototype system testing, EMC pre-screening and compliance testing, and formal device verification. 
    Related Searches
    • R&D & Design
    Related Knowledge Center
    • R&D & Design

    Related Content


      Trending
      • Dexcom Reportedly In Talks To Acquire Insulet | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • Shrinking Medical Devices Create Sizable Challenges For Micromolders | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • 5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized The Healthcare Industry | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • Anumana's ECG Pulmonary Hypertension AI Algorithm Gains Breakthrough Status | Medical Product Outsourcing
      • Prometheus Group Sued Over Reused Catheters And Rectal Sensors | Medical Product Outsourcing
      Breaking News
      • Medtronic, DaVita to Create New Kidney Care Firm
      • OmniGuide's RevoLix HTL Hybrid Thulium Laser OK'ed for BPH and Stone Treatments
      • In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation Takes Effect
      • Brian Case Appointed Chief Technology Officer at KORU Medical
      • Solid Growth Expected for India's Medical Device Sector
      View Breaking News >
      CURRENT ISSUE

      May 2022

      • Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure
      • Contract Design for Medtech
      • Diabetes Medical Device Technology Update
      • Medtech Full-Service Outsourcing Q&A 2022

      Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
      You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms And Conditions
      • Contact Us

      follow us

      Subscribe
      Nutraceuticals World

      Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

      Thorne Relaunches Gut Health Test with Microbiome Wipe
      Alkemist Labs Announces Alkemist Assured Seal and Next Generation Transparency Reports
      GC Rieber Foundations Expand Philanthropic Efforts
      Coatings World

      Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

      ICP Receives ASC Innovation Award for Spray Foam That Meets Changing Environmental Regulations
      Pylon Coatings Uses Polygiene Biomaster & Verimaster for Antimicrobial Surface Protection
      Sto Corp. Recognized with Multiple Honors at the EIFS Hero Awards
      Medical Product Outsourcing

      Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

      Medtronic, DaVita to Create New Kidney Care Firm
      OmniGuide's RevoLix HTL Hybrid Thulium Laser OK'ed for BPH and Stone Treatments
      In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation Takes Effect
      Contract Pharma

      Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

      DFE Pharma Opens India CoE for Fast-Track Formulation Services
      Helsinn Establishes New R&D Hub in the U.S.
      CureVac, myNEO Partner on Antigen Targets for mRNA-Cancer Vax Development
      Beauty Packaging

      Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

      Carlyle To Acquire HCP Packaging
      Estée Lauder Companies Faces Class Action Lawsuit
      La Roche-Posay Launches Matte Moisturizer for Oily Skin
      Happi

      Latest Breaking News From Happi

      Women in Flavor and Fragrance Present 2022 Recognition Awards Dinner June 16
      Univar Expands Distribution Agreement with ANGUS Chemical Company
      Acme-Hardesty Passes Responsible Distribution Verification
      Ink World

      Latest Breaking News From Ink World

      NAPIM’s Virtual Digital & Emerging Technologies Conference is Back, June 14–15, 2022
      CEMATEX Introduces Online Business Platform to Connect Global Textile Community
      PICO Chemical Celebrates 46 Years
      Label & Narrow Web

      Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

      Teklynx software helps Top Clean Injection validate labels
      Zeller+Gmelin named Berry Global’s 2021 Ink Supplier of the Year
      Videojet and Loftware partner to accelerate labeling automation
      Nonwovens Industry

      Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

      Rael Raises $35M in Series B Funding
      Schobertechnologies Offers Rotary Web-fed Converting Solutions
      Thorne Relaunches Gut Health Test with Microbiome Wipe
      Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

      ManaMed's ManaSport Wearable Ultrasound Earns FDA Nod
      Ekso Bionics Names Jerome Wong as Interim CFO
      Exactech Completes First Surgeries Using Next-Gen Cage Glenoid
      Printed Electronics Now

      Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

      ams OSRAM Introduces New Horticulture LEDs
      Avery Dennison Launches AD Twist U7XM Inlays
      ARPA-E Funding Drives Innovation, Industry Partnerships at NREL

      Copyright © 2022 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

      AD BLOCKER DETECTED

      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


      FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login