• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech

    Assembly & Automation Experts Share Thoughts on Medtech Trends

    Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics

    The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?

    Preserve and Protect: Sustainability Initiatives for Medtech Manufacturing
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    Dexcom, RxFood Ally for AI-Based Nutrition, Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management

    Sharon Levita Joins ForSight Robotics as CFO

    PECA Labs Names Three New Board Members

    Astellas, Eko Health Collaborate on Heart Failure Detection Tech

    Sherri Ferstler Joins Tactile Medical as Senior Sales VP
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech

    Assembly & Automation Experts Share Thoughts on Medtech Trends

    Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics

    The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?

    Preserve and Protect: Sustainability Initiatives for Medtech Manufacturing
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Back to School for Medical Device Cybersecurity Training

    Driving Clinical Trial Excellence to Help Study Teams Run a Faster Relay Race

    Medtech’s Supply Chain: From Disruption to Opportunity

    Are Medtech’s Mega-Deals Gone For Good?

    Will a Skilling Gap Hinder Organizational Readiness for Medtech’s New Age of AI?
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    Medbio LLC

    JBC Technologies

    Cirtec Medical

    Providence Enterprise USA Inc.

    LEMO USA Inc.
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    A One-Stop-Shop, Turnkey Solution Is Paramount for Success

    How Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Are Revolutionizing the Medical Device Industry

    Medical Device Commercialization: It’s What, Not When, to Transfer to Manufacturing

    How In Silico Simulations Can Slash Medical Device Development Risk

    The Top 7 AI Applications Transforming Medical Device Manufacturing
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    Medbio LLC

    JBC Technologies

    Cirtec Medical

    Providence Enterprise USA Inc.

    LEMO USA Inc.
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    First in Man

    ...

    First in Man
    Steve Maylish, Chief Commercial Officer, Fusion Biotec03.07.17
    There are two main paths for clinical studies in the United States for medical devices. The first is the most common, called a traditional study. This approach follows a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) design process including agency testing, pre-clinical trials, and then first-in-man trials. The second, which is called an early feasibility study, can be just as important but is used much less often. First-in-man trials accomplished in an early feasibility study can be extremely important for innovative concepts with poor preclinical models.

    Done correctly, it can facilitate efficient use of capital, and companies understanding this process and innovating multiple designs can dramatically increase their odds of success.

    A traditional feasibility study is a clinical study where safety and effectiveness data is gathered on a near-final or final device design. Because this takes place later in development, the FDA expects to see more preclinical data in an investigational device exemption (IDE) application. This preclinical data can be a result of mathematical modeling and simulation, bench, in-vitro, animal, or cadaver testing. Later, this clinical study becomes part of an FDA submission.



    Traditional feasibility study progression

    On the contrary, the FDA describes an early feasibility study as “a limited clinical investigation of a device early in development, typically before the device design has been finalized, for a specific indication. It may be used to evaluate the device design concept with respect to initial clinical safety and device functionality in a small number of subjects (generally fewer than 10 initial subjects) when this information cannot practically be provided through additional nonclinical assessments or appropriate nonclinical tests are unavailable.



    Early feasibility study progression

    Information obtained from an early feasibility study may guide device modifications.” Because the early device is usually not substantially equivalent to the final commercial device, this study is not part of the final FDA submission.

    As defined by the FDA, “A first in human study is a type of study in which a device for a specific indication is evaluated for the first time in human subjects,” which is referred to as first-in-man.

    Traditional feasibility studies are the preferred path for design changes incorporating next-generation technologies. Here, the most value is created by following design controls, performing clinical studies (if required), and creating an FDA submission package. (This is mentioned in “Creating Value by Design,” which is my article in the November/December 2016 issue of MPO.) A traditional study gathers proof as to the effectiveness and safety of the planned device. Early feasibility studies for “first-in-man,” however, apply more to new concepts, where there are few or no suitable preclinical models. In this study, one gathers early feedback on a design concept before full development.

    For today’s large device companies, considerable innovation comes from acquisition, but this was not always true. In the past, design labs endowed with a certain amount of autonomy took advantage of early iteration and human trials. Internal product extensions and next-generation devices are now the beneficiaries of the current regulatory environment, not innovation. The innovation path is much riskier.

    Remember clinical trial results can only be submitted to the FDA for approval if the device is equivalent or substantially equivalent to the final commercial product. If not, a device redesign usually requires retesting and repeated clinical studies—which are costs companies clearly wish to avoid.

    For truly innovative devices, the healthcare system and funding groups can’t afford the cost or risk of a delayed market launch.

    However, there are also a number of reasons why a company may not want to wait until right before FDA submission to test their device in humans, the most important being feasibility. Learning that a device doesn’t work well in humans at the end of a development effort is devastating. Unfortunately, many medical devices need to be tested in humans in order to determine viability. The sooner this can be done, the better; if innovation is your game, then fail early and fail often.

    Much has been written about the venture capital model and how venture capitalists (VCs) have moved to less risky, later- stage investing. This can make it difficult to get funding. In the past, VC risk was mitigated through diversification. Today, VC risk is mitigated by avoiding risk. One reason this occurred is due to the cost of tens of millions of dollars just to get to clinical trials. Additionally, when VC funds increased in size, so too did their size of investments in startups. This meant a startup company could move forward carrying more risk.

    With a laser focus on unmet clinical needs and disruptive technology, capital investing prefers new, innovative ideas and devices. With this comes more risk and uncertainty about efficacy. Add in the cost of clinical trials, increasing clinical trial requirements, and the resulting market delays, and it’s easy to appreciate a VC’s concerns.

    An incubator looking to maximize success, on the other hand, can limit investment in each product idea until first-in-man is proven. This allows for a return to diversification and large investment only after successful first-in-man trials. Here, early concept development and testing more closely replicates the research and development of the past. A concept’s effectiveness is determined early because it’s tested in humans. It’s also determined early whether or not the device can generate a return, because costs are better understood once prototypes are built. Proving feasibility in man early can limit investment by a factor of 10 if the idea fails. If it doesn’t, the data needed to secure additional funding is still available.

    This model delays hiring most of the management and staff until feasibility is proven. Some of the more successful incubators work with venture capital consortiums in this way. Due diligence is completed—including marketing and intellectual property—then the opportunity is submitted to a venture capital consortium for series A funding. If approved, the company stays focused on milestones that generate higher valuations and greater probability of success: addressing safety, efficacy, and first-in-man. In these early stages, the incubator relies on outsourcing and well-seasoned professionals to ensure a focus on development and clinical milestones. Only the work that increases value is done. Later, the management team is put together and the company funded, but only if the early feasibility first-in-man study is successful.

    So what does a design team need to know to qualify its product for an IDE? The key to IDE approval for early feasibility “first-in-man” is safety.

    Concerning early feasibility, the FDA writes, “Depending on the device and intended use, it may be appropriate and acceptable to defer some device testing until after the early feasibility study, if the testing will not provide additional meaningful information regarding basic device safety or functionality. For some devices or intended uses, particularly for highly innovative devices, FDA recognizes that appropriate nonclinical test methodologies to assess some critical parameters may not be available or are impractical to complete, and therefore, these parameters would need to be evaluated clinically.”

    An IDE is required prior to evaluating investigational devices in a clinical study. Depending on classification of significant or non-significant risk, there are two ways to secure IDE approval in the United States. To conduct first-in-man studies on non-significant risk devices, an IDE is approved by an institutional review board (IRB). If the study involves a significant risk device, the IDE must also be approved by the FDA.

    If a medical device requires local IRB as well as FDA approval of an IDE because of significant risk, the approval can be time consuming. In the United States, first-in-man studies require the same review process as any other clinical trial, if the device is determined to be a significant risk. It is much quicker to get first-in-man trials approved in countries outside the United States (OUS).

    From the design side, safety is the priority. The emphasis is on risk mitigation, as well as user and patient safety. The device must not pose a safety risk, or if there are risks to the patient, they are outweighed by its anticipated benefits and the knowledge gained. The investigation is scientifically sound and there is reason to believe the device will be effective.

    The challenge for design teams is to determine what is safe enough for human trials, without going too far. At this point in the process, the concept is at feasibility. Design controls need to be understood and planned, but not completed. The FDA requirement is to “establish and maintain a plan that describes or references the design and development activities.” The design control plan does not need to be submitted in the IDE application. It’s advisable to consider design inputs, especially hazard analysis, follow design controls to a point, provide validation where needed, complete safety testing, and follow good manufacturing procedures.

    There should be reports that cover basic safety issues, catastrophic failure modes, and risk mitigation processes. Investigational plans should include risk analysis and mitigation, clinical protocol, human subject protection measures, and monitoring procedures.

    Over the last 10 years, there has been a gradual increase in the number of clinical trials conducted OUS. There’s also been an increase in the number of FDA 510(k) submissions requiring clinical trials. At present, more than half of all clinical trials are conducted outside the United States.

    In addition, the cost of clinical trials in the United States is about twice as much as outside the United States and according to the Advanced Medical Technology Association, the time from first contact with the FDA (for significant risk devices) to IDE approval in a 510(k) device is twice as long as European Union approval—14 months as compared to seven. In many European countries, local ethics committees have control over review and approval of clinical trials.

    With the estimated cost of medical device clinical trials ranging from $1 million to $10 million (or more), using clinical data acquired from OUS can produce significant savings. Also, longer lead times in the United States result in more costs and delayed revenue streams that VCs are unwilling to fund. The time to market has increased, more clinical trials are being requested, the FDA is unpredictable, VCs are more risk adverse, and costs have continued to rise.

    With funding’s increased adversity to risk, there are an increasing number of groups being created to incubate, accelerate, or seed medical ideas and concepts. While some provide space in a collaborative environment or crowdfunding, others are much more proactive. These incubators concentrate on getting to pre-clinical or first-in-man trials early, and proving the technology during Series A funding. Once proven, a considerable amount of risk is retired and further investment is justified. However, final clinical trials are still necessary in the end and this approach is costlier, so use this method wisely.

    Whether you’re a large corporation with a number of innovative projects, an incubator with several, or a startup working on a single novel device, a first-in-man mindset during early feasibility can dramatically reduce risk. Working outside the United States can also reduce the clinical study cost and study time by half. If capital efficiency is part of your business model, then getting early validation in human subjects outside the United States should warrant serious consideration. 


    Steve Maylish has been part of the medical device community for more than 30 years. He is currently chief commercial officer for Fusion Biotec, an Irvine, Calif.-based contract engineering firm that brings together art, science, and engineering to create medical devices. Early in his career, Maylish held positions at Fortune 100 corporations such as Johnson & Johnson, Shiley, Sorin Group, Baxter Healthcare, and Edwards Lifesciences. 
    Related Searches
    • fda approval
    • validation
    • development
    • clinical trial
    Related Knowledge Center
    • Patient Monitoring
    • Surgical
    • Cardiovascular
    • Testing
    • Diagnostics
    • Neurological
    • R&D & Design
      Loading, Please Wait..

      Trending
      • A New Approach To Post-Market Surveillance
      • Diabetes Innovation: MIT Engineers Unveil Implantable Device With Oxygen Factory
      • Danaher Names New Environmental And Applied Solutions Company Veralto
      • FDA Clears LiveMetric's Wearable Blood Pressure Monitoring Tech
      • Cochlear Implant Study Underway At Mayo Clinic
      Breaking News
      • Dexcom, RxFood Ally for AI-Based Nutrition, Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management
      • Sharon Levita Joins ForSight Robotics as CFO
      • PECA Labs Names Three New Board Members
      • Astellas, Eko Health Collaborate on Heart Failure Detection Tech
      • Sherri Ferstler Joins Tactile Medical as Senior Sales VP
      View Breaking News >
      CURRENT ISSUE

      September 2023

      • Superior Subtractive Solutions for Machining Medtech
      • Medical Device Industry Experts' Thought on Assembly & Automation
      • Power Trip: A Discussion of Custom Medical Electronics
      • The MDR Transition: An Opportunity for Design Change?
      • View More >

      Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
      You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

      • About Us
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms And Conditions
      • Contact Us

      follow us

      Subscribe
      Nutraceuticals World

      Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

      GOED Releases Sustainability Report for Omega-3s Industry
      ABC’s Journal HerbalGram Celebrates 40th Anniversary
      Curcumin May Be As Effective as PPI for Indigestion
      Coatings World

      Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

      Sherwin-Williams Introduces High-Flexibility Body Filler
      Axalta’s Brian Berube to Retire
      Masco Corporation Names Richard Westenberg VP, CFO
      Medical Product Outsourcing

      Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

      Dexcom, RxFood Ally for AI-Based Nutrition, Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management
      Sharon Levita Joins ForSight Robotics as CFO
      PECA Labs Names Three New Board Members
      Contract Pharma

      Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

      Valneva Signs $32M IXIARO Supply Pact with U.S. Government
      Charnwood Molecular Rebrands to Charnwood Discovery
      Pierre Fabre, Vernalis Enter Oncology Drug Discovery Alliance
      Beauty Packaging

      Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

      Groupe Pochet Celebrates 400th Anniversary
      Ulta Beauty Launches Initiative to Spark National Conversation About Joy
      Mary Kay Unveils New Treatment to Diminish Visible Effects of Pollution & Aging
      Happi

      Latest Breaking News From Happi

      Lipoid Kosmetik’s Mountain Tea Pro Wins BSB Innovation Award
      Attitude’s 'Paper Beats Plastic' Campaign Takes Over Los Angeles
      L'Oréal Invests in Chinese Biotech Company
      Ink World

      Latest Breaking News From Ink World

      Cooper Watson Acquires Tower Products
      The Durst Group Awarded Eight 2023 PRINTING United Alliance Pinnacle Awards
      Weekly Recap: Wikoff Color, HP, INX VC Top This Week’s Stories
      Label & Narrow Web

      Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

      Bost to 'unwrap the future of flexible packaging' at open house
      IDENTCO brings new automated wire marking system to Mexico
      Maan Engineering chooses Vetaphone for linerless labels
      Nonwovens Industry

      Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

      Weekly Recap: Soft N' Dry Seeks to Expand Private Label Roll Out, Albis Completes Work on Line
      Lenzing Earns EU Ecolabel at Indonesian Plant
      Albis Completes Work On Extra Wide Carding, Blending Line
      Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

      Bone Health Technologies Adds Two New Board Directors
      MicroPort Orthopedics Announces Agenda & Speakers for Its Global Medial-Pivot Symposium
      Study Reveals Discovery of Unique Vertebral Stem Cells
      Printed Electronics Now

      Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

      First Solar Breaks Ground on $1.1B, 3.5 GW Louisiana Manufacturing Facility
      HID to Showcase Future-Proof Solutions at GITEX 2023
      Weekly Recap: Mergers and Acquisitions, IEC’s IME Standards Top This Week’s Stories

      Copyright © 2023 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

      AD BLOCKER DETECTED

      Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
      Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


      FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login