• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    OEMs Seek Molders Offering Timely Techniques

    Robotic Surgery: Cutting Through to the Latest

    Packaging, Sterilization Considerations Go Part and Parcel with Product Development

    Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure

    OEMs Are Demanding Designs that Challenge Suppliers
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    Cepheid, BioGX Partner to Create GeneXpert Monkeypox Test

    Siemens' Varian Gains FDA IDE Nod for FAST-02 Trial

    Acutus Medical Launches AcQCross Line Extension

    Accelmed Partners II, Lauxera Capital Partners Invest in Veranex

    Agnes Lee Named SVP of Investor Relations, Strategic Planning at Inogen
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    OEMs Seek Molders Offering Timely Techniques

    Robotic Surgery: Cutting Through to the Latest

    Packaging, Sterilization Considerations Go Part and Parcel with Product Development

    Cybersecurity Challenges Leave Medical Device Makers Insecure

    OEMs Are Demanding Designs that Challenge Suppliers
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Theranos Fraud Trial, Part II: The Blame Game Continues

    An Update on Surgical Robotics

    Letting the Light In: How Failure Analysis is the Cornerstone of Success

    Three Talent Strategies to Attract High-Demand Skills

    The Advantages of Bioburden Screening for Sterilization Validation
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    Cirtec Medical

    Trademark Plastics Inc.

    JBC Technologies

    Xact Wire EDM Corp.

    Concise Engineering
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    Investment in Health Startups Drops

    The Power of Leveraging Customer Relationships

    Cost Effective & Efficient Wire EDM Techniques

    How MedTech Professionals Can Help Combat Physician Burnout

    How to Optimize Manufacturing Lines and Choose Which Machines to Buy
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    Cirtec Medical

    Trademark Plastics Inc.

    JBC Technologies

    Xact Wire EDM Corp.

    Concise Engineering
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    Supercharge Medical Device Innovation Using Effective User Preference Studies

    User preference and evaluation studies have been a mainstay design tool for medical device development for decades.

    Supercharge Medical Device Innovation Using Effective User Preference Studies
    Examples of ergonomic configurations for a laparoscopic surgical instrument, including variations on grip and actuation style, interface action and placement, cable access, and orientation. Images courtesy of BlackHägen Design.
    Supercharge Medical Device Innovation Using Effective User Preference Studies
    Study models for a portable external defibrillator test a variety of configurative variations like form factor, handgrip, style of deployment, display size, and layout while maintaining similar overall volumes, weight, and mockup execution.
    Philip Remedios, Principal, Director of Design & Development, BlackHägen Design04.01.20
    User preference and evaluation studies have been a mainstay design tool for medical device development for decades. To veteran engineers, this design tool is simply good practice even if not specifically required by regulating bodies. However, there are opportunities to significantly enhance output quality and clarity of input requirements that drive the formal design process. Understanding and providing solutions to unexpected usability aspirations often produce powerful and valuable intellectual property that can positively differentiate and protect a product from competition.

    Ideally, some level of “discovery” research has already been conducted to collect important design criteria that will ultimately determine the device’s commercial success. At this stage, pragmatic prioritization of critical versus non-critical features and functions is usually not clear. Additionally, early user research often paints a qualitative, non-linear definition of problem statements that requires an actionable assessment of which singular concepts hold the most value. Representing the best collection of these early concepts for preference feedback allows the R&D team to subsequently converge disparate sub-systems into a harmonious and unified design both rapidly and efficiently, minimizing the risk and impact of downstream deviation.

    The study also provides an opportunity to fill gaps in design requirements or quantify system specifications through further probing. It helps establish the features and functions for the minimally viable product and rank additional features in order of their value versus negative impact to determine additions to the requirements, finalize system specifications, and provide insights for future product planning considerations.

    A methodical, well thought out protocol is the backbone of a successful evaluation study. The basis of the study is to enhance the vision of what the emerging design concept must be and what factors will make it acceptable and ideally favorable in the intended market. Develop an interview discussion guide that reviews features and variations between models, ensuring review order is randomized, if possible. Test simpler, less capable options first to qualify adequacy of function or effectiveness as users will always want better, faster, and smaller if given the choice. Frontload quantitative questions so answers aren’t colored or influenced by the subsequent study model review’s qualitative responses. A simple Likert Scale of 1-5 can be deployed when necessary to understand the level of objective preference to understand the user’s rationale and motivation. Ensure the qualitative weighting between feature options is consistent (is Option A really a 5 compared to Option B which scored a 3 and Option C a 2?).

    The key to maximizing the study’s value is structuring the content and development of response stimuli. These discrete simulators and study models are generally representative of the required size, resolution, volumes, and relevant configurations driven by technical and cost limitations. Each stimulus should demonstrate disparate features without introducing qualitative flavoring such as individual styling, colors, materials, finishes, and graphics. They may include dynamic display mockup and kinematic function if deemed important for accurate evaluation. This can include graphical interface screen and navigation, touchpoint access, door deployment, attachment of sub-systems (disposable to handpiece), representative weight (if portable), and ergonomic shaping (if handheld).

    Another important planning task is determining the primary, secondary, and tertiary end-user groups (e.g., surgeon, nurse, biotech, buyer, patient) in weighted proportions to obtain appropriate feedback. Plan to interview approximately n=4-7 of each user group who will operate or influence the device design and recruit at least one more of each user group for inevitable cancellations. If the user group is homogenous in applicable attributes, skew to the bottom of the range. If the user group is diverse, recruit seven or more. If possible, recruit from varying institutional settings—teaching, private, or public hospital versus outpatient clinic based on projected market opportunities. Ensure the participant screener avoids wasted effort recruiting under-qualified users. There are many professional agencies that can assist with recruitment which can be extremely challenging in the clinical space.

    Honoraria compensation is standard practice in the industry to encourage participation in the study. It is important to understand the current rates so high-quality participants can be assured. Some corporations have established “fair-market values” for legal reasons that are not kept up to date, which severely hampers the recruitment process. If in doubt, err on the generous side to ensure the best outcome—after all, the additive cost to the project is a drop in the ocean compared to the overall R&D budget for such a critical function.

    Keep the interview team to a moderator and notetaker, with the possibility of a third person to support stimuli management if necessary. At BlackHägen Design, the moderator is typically a usability specialist and notetaker an industrial designer or engineer. The combination of these disciplines improves the quality of the analysis and recommendations post-interview. Additional observers can be accommodated behind one-way glass or via online live streaming video. Allow ample time between sessions to reset and potentially repair the stimuli and accommodate tardy sessions. Consider adding an initial training or familiarization exercise if the device or procedure is not widely practiced or is relatively new or different than the standard—although this action may diminish the opportunity to evaluate the intuitiveness of a user’s discovery interaction with an unfamiliar interface.

    Plan for each interview to not last more than 60-75 minutes to avoid fatigue. If testing content requires more time, it may be necessary to plan for two separate preference studies.

    Keep the stimuli/models under wraps until they are ready to review, deploying one at a time to avoid distraction. Previously viewed stimuli can be left uncovered for comparison.

    The interviews should be conducted in a uniform, repeatable manner ensuring questions are structured so they do not introduce bias. Note-taking should be tracked to the activities in the study to ease analysis efforts. Advanced tools such as eye-tracking software and physiological monitoring (BP, respiration, galvanic skin response) can help match emotional and stress response to tasks.

    This phase will determine its overall effectiveness, so it’s vital to extract accurate and traceable data for identification of preferences and user needs trends. Because this research is highly qualitative and interpretive, establish emerging preference patterns to draw accurate conclusions. Sometimes it becomes necessary to add participants to the initial population until these patterns become indisputable. However, the small number of datapoints will never become statistically significant and shouldn’t be confused with quantitative research techniques.

    Ensure you understand the “why” of the preference—the true user need and not a suggestion for the solution. The moderator must continue to probe each participant after they indicate what they prefer to fully understand why they prefer what they indicate. The ultimate device should be designed by professionals to meet the need and not merely implement the suggested preference. Distill the whys into a set of user needs the project stakeholders will integrate into the formal design requirements. Balancing the requirements and user needs against the feedback in the preference study and other user research determines their suitability to function, use-safety, and ease-of-use.

    Carefully interpret all critical user requirements from previous contextual inquiry and marketing studies into a few carefully segmented and similarly executed stimuli and study model configurations that will test variations on features, functions, and interfaces to determine the best solutions. Leave qualitative flavoring out of the equation; all models should be as consistent in execution as possible. Don’t ask leading questions and don’t suggest answers; encourage participants to answer with their own words and emphasis. If the protocol is well-structured and the stimuli of sufficient resolution and quality, the design team should not have much difficulty cherry-picking the best features and interfaces as they head into the hardcore design development phases. Balancing user preferences against risk, cost, and reliability remains the next hurdle to determine where compromises may need to be made to ensure the final design provides the best value for its intended use. 


    Philip Remedios is principal and design director at BlackHägen Design, an R&D consultancy focused on medical device innovation. With a combined design and engineering background, Remedios has spent most of his 33-year career in executive consulting roles, developing project plans, and managing integrated technical teams, schedules, and budgets.
    Related Searches
    • data
    • research
    • device
    • Software
    Related Knowledge Center
    • R&D & Design
    Loading, Please Wait..

    Trending
    • 5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized The Healthcare Industry
    • FDA OKs J&J Vision's AcuVue Oasys Max 1-Day Contact Lenses
    • How To Overcome The Top 6 Medical Device Manufacturing Challenges
    • Labcorp Launches At-Home Collection Device For Diabetes Risk Testing
    • Intermountain Healthcare & Siemens Healthineers Open 3 Tellica Outpatient Imaging Centers
    Breaking News
    • Cepheid, BioGX Partner to Create GeneXpert Monkeypox Test
    • Siemens' Varian Gains FDA IDE Nod for FAST-02 Trial
    • Acutus Medical Launches AcQCross Line Extension
    • Accelmed Partners II, Lauxera Capital Partners Invest in Veranex
    • Agnes Lee Named SVP of Investor Relations, Strategic Planning at Inogen
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    June 2022

    • OEMs Seek Molders Offering Timely Techniques
    • Robotic Surgery: Cutting Through to the Latest
    • Packaging, Sterilization Considerations Go Part and Parcel with Product Development
    • View More >

    Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
    You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms And Conditions
    • Contact Us

    follow us

    Subscribe
    Nutraceuticals World

    Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

    CoQ10 and Royal Jelly Supplementation May Improve High Intensity Exercise
    Shiitake Mushroom Extract Appears Helpful in HPV Infections
    Fi & Hi Europe Returns with Over 20,000 Global Attendees Expected
    Coatings World

    Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

    H.M. Royal Becomes Exclusive OCSiAl Distributor
    American Colors to Expand Sandusky, Ohio Facility
    Vaughn O’Dea Named Director of Epoxytec
    Medical Product Outsourcing

    Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

    Cepheid, BioGX Partner to Create GeneXpert Monkeypox Test
    Siemens' Varian Gains FDA IDE Nod for FAST-02 Trial
    Acutus Medical Launches AcQCross Line Extension
    Contract Pharma

    Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

    Ixaka & Minaris Sign Tech Transfer & GMP Manufacturing Agreement for Cell Therapy Candidate
    Pfizer, BioNTech Adapt COVID Vax Against Omicron
    CoreRx Expands Capabilities
    Beauty Packaging

    Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

    Top 5 Beauty Tech Trends at Perfect Corp.'s Global Forum
    John Frieda Supports the LGBTQIA+ Community
    Athena Club Launches in Canada
    Happi

    Latest Breaking News From Happi

    Fencing Champion Bebe Vio Grandis Named Spokeswoman of L’Oréal Paris
    Past Henkel Exec Christian Chopra Named President of Scotch Porter
    Color Street Celebrates Foster, Adoption Awareness with Limited-Edition Print
    Ink World

    Latest Breaking News From Ink World

    Dr. Tammo Boinowitz to Join Management Board of ALTANA AG
    Flint Offset Packaging Solutions Announces Price Increases for Sheetfed Inks
    Weekly Recap: INX’s VC Fund, Screen Industry and Ball Top This Week’s News
    Label & Narrow Web

    Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

    Harveer Sahni recognized with Global Achievement Award
    Color-Logic partners with Taktiful 
    ALTANA announces Management Board change
    Nonwovens Industry

    Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

    Fibertex Personal Care Awarded EcoVadis Awards for Sustainability
    Yanpai Orders Batt Forming Equipment for Needlepunch Line
    Weekly Recap: SWM and Neenah Introduce Mativ Inc., Avgol honored for Biotransformation Technology & More
    Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Researchers Discover Novel Patching Material for Bone Defects
    Boston Centerless Opens Second Manufacturing Plant in Indiana
    Researchers Develop Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Smart Metamaterial Implants
    Printed Electronics Now

    Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

    Identiv-Powered CVS Spoken Rx Wins NFC Forum 2022 Innovation Award
    LG Display Announces Winners of This Year’s OLEDs GO! Competition
    Weekly Recap: eMagin, Applied Materials, and Schott Top This Week’s Stories

    Copyright © 2022 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

    AD BLOCKER DETECTED

    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
    Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


    FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login