Explore the most recent editions of MPO Magazine, featuring expert commentary, industry trends, and breakthrough technologies.
Access the full digital version of MPO Magazine anytime, anywhere, with interactive content and enhanced features.
Join our community of medical device professionals. Subscribe to MPO Magazine for the latest news and updates delivered straight to your mailbox.
Explore the transformative impact of additive manufacturing on medical devices, including design flexibility and materials.
Learn about outsourcing options in the medical device sector, focusing on quality, compliance, and operational excellence.
Stay updated on the latest electronic components and technologies driving innovation in medical devices.
Discover precision machining and laser processing solutions that enhance the quality and performance of medical devices.
Explore the latest materials and their applications in medical devices, focusing on performance, biocompatibility, and regulatory compliance.
Learn about advanced molding techniques for producing high-quality, complex medical device components.
Stay informed on best practices for packaging and sterilization methods that ensure product safety and compliance.
Explore the latest trends in research and development, as well as design innovations that drive the medical device industry forward.
Discover the role of software and IT solutions in enhancing the design, functionality, and security of medical devices.
Learn about the essential testing methods and standards that ensure the safety and effectiveness of medical devices.
Stay updated on innovations in tubing and extrusion processes for medical applications, focusing on precision and reliability.
Stay ahead with real-time updates on critical news affecting the medical device industry.
Access unique content and insights not available in the print edition of the MPO Magazine.
Explore feature articles that delve into specific topics within the medical device industry, providing in-depth analysis and insights.
Gain perspective from industry experts through regular columns addressing key challenges and innovations in medical devices.
Read the editor’s thoughts on the current state of the medical device industry.
Discover the leading companies in the medical device sector, showcasing their innovations and contributions to the industry.
Explore detailed profiles of medical device contract manufacturing and service provider companies, highlighting their capabilities and offerings.
Learn about the capabilities of medical device contract manufacturing and service provider companies, showcasing their expertise and resources.
Watch informative videos featuring industry leaders discussing trends, technologies, and insights in medical devices.
Short, engaging videos providing quick insights and updates on key topics within the medical device industry.
Tune in to discussions with industry experts sharing their insights on trends, challenges, and innovations in the medical device sector.
Participate in informative webinars led by industry experts, covering various topics relevant to the medical device sector.
Stay informed on the latest press releases and announcements from leading companies in the medical device manufacturing industry.
Access comprehensive eBooks covering a range of topics on medical device manufacturing, design, and innovation.
Highlighting the innovators and entrepreneurs who are shaping the future of medical technology.
Explore sponsored articles and insights from leading companies in the medical device manufacturing sector.
Read in-depth whitepapers that explore key issues, trends, and research findings for the medical device industry.
Discover major industry events, trade shows, and conferences focused on medical devices and technology.
Get real-time updates and insights live from the CompaMed/Medica conference floor.
Join discussions and networking opportunities at the MPO Medtech Forum, focusing on the latest trends and challenges in the industry.
Attend the MPO Summit for insights and strategies from industry leaders shaping the future of medical devices.
Participate in the ODT Forum, focusing on orthopedic device trends and innovations.
Discover advertising opportunities with MPO to reach a targeted audience of medical device professionals.
Review our editorial guidelines for submissions and contributions to MPO.
Read about our commitment to protecting your privacy and personal information.
Familiarize yourself with the terms and conditions governing the use of MPOmag.com.
What are you searching for?
Only FDA-approved HPV assay to individually identify and report genotypes beyond 16, 18, and 45, according to BD.
July 22, 2020
By: PR Newswire
BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) received approval for a pre-market approval (PMA) supplement from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for an expanded version of its BD Onclarity HPV Assay. The PMA supplement includes the expansion for genotype reporting beyond HPV genotypes 16, 18, and 45 to include types 31, 51, 52, 33/58, 35/39/68, and 56/59/66 genotypes making the BD Onclarity HPV Assay the only FDA-approved assay to individually identify and report these genotype results. The value of extended genotyping for cervical cancer screening and triage has been reported from large clinical studies since 2015.1-8 Additionally, the need for expanded HPV genotyping for cervical screening has been recognized since 2016.9 In many cases, the reporting of HPV genotypes with the screening test result could improve risk stratification and support risk-based patient management. The April 2020 publication of the ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines anticipated that extended genotyping would be introduced soon.10 “BD Onclarity™ extended genotyping is data-driven precision medicine at its best, helping us effectively and efficiently manage our patients,” said Mark H. Stoler, MD Professor Emeritus of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System. “Contemporary management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results demands an assessment of their risk of pre-cancer. An abundance of recent science clearly shows that knowing the HPV genotype of the patient provides excellent differential stratification of those risks.”1,4-8,11-13 “It is well known that different HPV genotypes carry different risk of cervical cancer, and without the specific knowledge of the HPV genotype in a screening sample many women will be over-treated needlessly,” said Jesper Bonde, PhD, Senior Researcher and Molecular Pathology Laboratory Manager, Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark.12 “Screening strategies that employ HPV tests with simultaneous genotyping offer a simple way to improve cervical cancer screening to the benefit of the woman and health care providers by allowing risk stratification already on the screening sample.” The reporting of HPV genotypes with the screening tests and surveillance tests will facilitate same-genotype persistence tracking and risk-based management. A recent systematic review by Bottari et al concluded that, “evaluation of the HPV genotype persistence may represent a valid option to monitor patients treated for CIN 2+ lesions, because relapses were detected only in patients with persistence of the same genotype detected at baseline.”11,13-15 “With this FDA approval, BD can now offer laboratories, clinicians and patients access to critical information in screening for cervical cancer in the United States and other countries recognizing the PMA supplement or CE mark,” said Dave Hickey, president, Integrated Diagnostic Solutions at BD. “Our goal is to continue the global fight towards eliminating diseases and associated deaths due to cervical cancer with our comprehensive diagnostic solutions.” References 1 Wright, T. C., Jr. et al. Detection of Cervical Neoplasia by Human Papillomavirus Testing in an Atypical Squamous Cells-Undetermined Significance Population: Results of the Becton Dickinson Onclarity Trial. Am J Clin Pathol 151, 53-62, doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqy084 (2019). 2 Schiffman, M. et al. A cohort study of cervical screening using partial HPV typing and cytology triage. International journal of cancer 139, 2606-2615, doi:10.1002/ijc.30375 (2016). 3 Schiffman, M. et al. A study of HPV typing for the management of HPV-positive ASC-US cervical cytologic results. Gynecol Oncol 138, 573-578, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.040 (2015). 4 Stoler, M. H. et al. HPV Testing With 16, 18, and 45 Genotyping Stratifies Cancer Risk for Women With Normal Cytology. American journal of clinical pathology 151, 433-442, doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqy169 (2019). 5 Stoler, M. H. et al. The Onclarity Human Papillomavirus Trial: Design, methods, and baseline results. Gynecol Oncol 149, 498-505, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.007 (2018). 6 Stoler, M. H. et al. Stratified risk of high-grade cervical disease using onclarity HPV extended genotyping in women, >/=25years of age, with NILM cytology. Gynecol Oncol 153, 26-33, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.024 (2019). 7 Wright, T. C., Jr. et al. HPV infections and cytologic abnormalities in vaccinated women 21-34years of age: Results from the baseline phase of the Onclarity trial. Gynecol Oncol 153, 259-265, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.016 (2019). 8 Wright, T. C., Jr. et al. Risk detection for high-grade cervical disease using Onclarity HPV extended genotyping in women, >/=21years of age, with ASC-US or LSIL cytology. Gynecol Oncol 154, 360-367, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.012 (2019). 9 Cuzick, J. & Wheeler, C. Need for expanded HPV genotyping for cervical screening. Papillomavirus Res 2, 112-115, doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2016.05.004 (2016). 10 Schiffman, M., Wentzensen, N., Perkins, R. B. & Guido, R. S. An Introduction to the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 24, 87-89, doi:10.1097/lgt.0000000000000531 (2020). 11 Bottari, F. et al. Onclarity Human Papillomavirus Extended Genotyping in the Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2+ Lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis 23, 39-42, doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000441 (2019). 12 Bonde, J. H., Sandri, M. T., Gary, D. S. & Andrews, J. C. Clinical Utility of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. J Low Genit Tract Dis 24, 1-13, doi:10.1097/LGT.0000000000000494 (2020). 13 Bottari, F. et al. Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Compared With a Qualitative High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test After Treatment of High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol 134, 452-462, doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003409 (2019). 14 Bottari, F. & Iacobone, A. D. Profile of the BD HPV OnclarityTM assay. Expert review of molecular diagnostics 19, 565-570, doi:10.1080/14737159.2019.1622415 (2019). 15 Einstein, M. H. Precision Screening for Posttreatment Surveillance. Obstetrics & Gynecology 134, 1-2 (2019).
Enter your account email.
A verification code was sent to your email, Enter the 6-digit code sent to your mail.
Didn't get the code? Check your spam folder or resend code
Set a new password for signing in and accessing your data.
Your Password has been Updated !