• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    Computer Concepts for Medical Device Design

    IVD Manufacturers Are Being Put to the Test

    The New State of Medtech Outsourcing

    The Changing Face of Medtech Surface Treatment

    The Totally Tubular Technologies that Support Medical Devices
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Medtech Makers
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Regulatory
    Financial/Business
    Top News
    CardioRenal’s TENOR Device Receives Breakthrough Device Designation from FDA

    LifeQ Unveils New 24-Hour Sleep Solution

    Babson Diagnostics Welcomes New Clinical Advisor, Andrew Carroll

    EvoEndo Names CEO and Chief Operating Officer

    Electromedical Products International Forms Scientific Advisory Board
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    Computer Concepts for Medical Device Design

    IVD Manufacturers Are Being Put to the Test

    The New State of Medtech Outsourcing

    The Changing Face of Medtech Surface Treatment

    The Totally Tubular Technologies that Support Medical Devices
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Market Data
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Checking Up on Surgical Robotics

    Building a Network: How Synchron Is Developing a New Device—and a New Market

    Six Lessons Learned on Developing a Strong Company Culture

    As Hiring Slows, Companies Look Inward to Fulfill Talent Needs

    Artificial Intelligence: Medtech Opportunity or Health Danger?
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    Orthopedics
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    LEMO USA Inc.

    Halkey-Roberts Corporation

    Medbio LLC

    NDH Medical Inc.

    Providence Enterprise USA Inc.
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    eBook
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    6 Considerations for Companies on the Cusp of Being Acquired

    3 Key Elements to Consider When Managing a Medtech Sales Force

    Tech-Enabled Virtual Speech Therapy Improves Speech & Communication Skills

    Practical Strategies for Digitization and Integration in Medtech Manufacturing

    Sensors: The Heart of Minimally Invasive Equipment Technology
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    Outsourcing Directory
    LEMO USA Inc.

    Halkey-Roberts Corporation

    Medbio LLC

    NDH Medical Inc.

    Providence Enterprise USA Inc.
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
      • Orthopedics
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • eBook
    • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Market Data
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Columns

    Three Questions to Master Continual MDSAP Conformity

    ...

    Three Questions to Master Continual MDSAP Conformity
    Tony Parise, Product Strategist—Life Sciences, ETQ03.07.19
    Product recalls frequently make headlines and tarnish brand reputations as a result. In today’s digital world, one bad customer experience with quality can be broadcast in seconds, giving brands little time to react. Not prioritizing quality is both a risk to a brand’s reputation and—more importantly—can be detrimental to consumer health, which is particularly true when considering medical device production. In fact, the U.S. FDA recently reported over 80,000 flagged medical device injuries since 2008.

    Participating in quality audits is certainly nothing new to medical device manufacturers, though the nature of how they are conducted has changed drastically in the last few years with the introduction of the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP). Under the MDSAP, manufacturers can participate in a single audit of their quality management system (QMS) that will satisfy the compliance requirements and standards of all five participating medical device markets: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, and the U.S. The initial pilot ran from 2014 to 2016, and after a successful demonstration of the program’s effectiveness, the MDSAP Regulatory Authority Council decided to formalize it.

    Eliminating multiple audit cycles is an obvious benefit of the MDSAP, but the program’s long-term goals also include:
    • Reducing costs associated with multiple audit cycles, which require prep, hosting, and post-audit analysis, which can accumulate to millions of dollars in staffing costs
    • Streamlining new product registration by eliminating the hurdles posed by multiple audits
    • Creating clear global alignment around regulatory approaches and technical requirements based on international standards and best practices
    • Promoting regulatory program consistency, predictability, and transparency by standardizing audit practices and procedures
    Despite the benefits, complying with the MDSAP standard is not always easy. It requires compiling years of QMS documentation and maintaining readiness throughout the three-year audit cycle, which includes:
    • The Initial Certification Audit—at this stage, MDSAP Auditing Organizations (AO) thoroughly review the QMS to verify products are safe, effective, and meeting performance standards
    • The Surveillance Audit—the goal here is to verify the QMS continues to meet the required standards; however, this stage isn’t necessary if there have not been any significant changes since the last audit
    • The Recertification Audit—this evaluates the QMS once more to confirm it is effective and suitable to satisfy all standards and regulations
    On top of that, the MDSAP does not excuse companies from audit processes attached to regions outside the five participating countries. Medical device manufacturers who operate or distribute in other countries must undergo the audit cycles required within those regulatory environments. For smaller manufacturers with fewer resources, the time and monetary costs of participating in the program can be astronomical.

    These challenges are being further reviewed now that Canada has made the MDSAP its sole audit requirement as of Jan. 1, 2019. As a result, any medical device manufacturer not compliant with MDSAP—or does not have plans to become compliant soon—will no longer be allowed to sell devices in the Canadian market. The FDA has similar plans to move to the MDSAP and will provide a guidance document by September. And yet, a 2018 KPMG survey of regulatory and quality leaders at major medical device companies found 30 percent of mid-sized companies and 52 percent of small companies had yet to initiate their MDSAP programs. Perhaps even more alarming, only 8 percent of respondents noted they had achieved ISO certification, completed a successful MDSAP audit, and had a strategy in place for addressing QMS requirements.

    With the MDSAP well underway, manufacturers outside of that 8 percent are forced to evaluate whether they plan to move forward with their compliance plans or back out of participating markets. To avoid opportunity loss and the costs (both monetary and in brand equity) associated with non-compliance, medical device companies that have yet to undergo an MDSAP audit should ask the following questions.

    1. Does the Entire Organization Understand MDSAP and What It Entails?
    While quality managers and internal auditors will be responsible for ensuring the QMS is MDSAP-ready, driving a quality-first mindset should start from the top. C-suite executives must become well-educated on the parameters around the MDSAP to articulate its impact to the entire company, ensuring each employee focuses on creating quality processes and workflows adhering to the audit requirements.

    Regulators made this easy for business C-suite executives by creating the MDSAP Audit Model comprehensive guide. This guide outlines everything organizations can expect from the audit, including all 90 questions they will be asked. For the purposes of educating the entire organization, business leaders should focus on specific areas the audit will grade them on and how the audit works.

    For starters, each audit is conducted in a defined sequence to ensure consistency and provide AOs with a logical, efficient roadmap for assessing QMS. Throughout the three-year, three-stage audit cycle, AOs focus on identifying and addressing potential risks by evaluating seven different interrelated processes: management; measurement, analysis, and improvement; design and development; production and service controls; purchasing; device marketing authorization and facility registration; and medical device adverse events and advisory notice reporting. C-suite executives should understand the ins and outs of each of these processes and how they work to fully understand on what they will be evaluated.

    C-level executives should understand and communicate the audit processes to employees and also adequately understand the grading process, as well as the consequences of non-conformities (NCs). AOs leverage a grading matrix that divides the clauses of ISO 13485:2016 into two categories: those that directly and indirectly impact product safety and performance.

    Once an organization has been graded based on the matrix, that grade point is subject to escalation as the AOs evaluate areas of higher risk that could impact product safety and performance (such as a lack of documented process or procedure, or the release of a nonconforming medical device, indicating a direct QMS failure). The final NC grade will be between one (least critical) and six (most critical). Any grade of five or above requires immediate intervention from the AOs and regulatory authorities, who will check up on the manufacturer both immediately and sporadically throughout the year to ensure their QMS issues are fixed.

    Top-down education of the audit requirements and grading system ensures everyone in the organization makes quality an everyday priority, helps pass the initial certification audit, and ensures continual conformity moving forward.

    2. What Are the Organization’s NC Risks?
    To prepare for the initial certification audit, organizations should leverage the MDSAP Audit Model guide and report card to conduct their own QMS audit. The first step should be conducting a gap assessment of all standard operating procedures (SOPs) and processes with an eye toward identifying risks.

    Potential risks include:
    • Limited access to internal subject matter experts who uniquely understand the ins and outs of the QMS and product lifecycle. From procurement to production, preparing for MDSAP audits is a huge lift requiring participation from people across the organization who can quickly and accurately answer any AO questions
    • A lack of transparency and security in internal audit records, making it harder for manufacturers to trace sources of potential NCs. Transparency is a major factor for the MDSAP; it aims to make the product development and quality assurance processes clearer for regulators, clinicians, and patients
    • Disorganization, which can severely hinder a manufacturer’s ability to efficiently access data and documentation requested during the MDSAP audit process
    • Establishing an internal assessment program will enable manufacturers to quickly identify risks that might jeopardize conformity. However, this requires a great deal of documentation and internal training, and addressing any identified risks is not an overnight task. Manufacturers should consider the tools at their disposal to expedite the process.

    3. How Can Those Risks Be Resolved (and How Quickly Can It Be Done)?
    Unfortunately, time is of the essence when it comes to MDSAP, and any organization that hasn’t scheduled its initial audit is already behind. Those concerned with NCs or continual compliance should consider how an electronic tracking system and automated solution could help quickly assess, identify, and solve any risks.

    The key to evaluating a software solution to help manage MDSAP’s impact is finding features that are highly customizable to each manufacturer’s QMS processes and needs, and flexible enough to scale with them and support future growth. Investing in a solution with these features could help configure customer forms and workflows that set up internal audits that automatically verify individual standards, audit methods, and audit qualification—saving huge amounts of time and resources. By automating this process, medical device manufacturers can significantly reduce the waiting period for registering certain product types; improve staff efficiency by eliminating redundant, manual, and paper-intensive labor; and generate massive cost savings as a result. Moreover, a system will be set up enabling them to automatically facilitate audit processes—both for MDSAP and other traditional Quality Systems Inspection Technique (QSIT) audits—from start to finish. The system will also enable them to flag potential risks along the way and keep an organized, traceable audit trail to quickly solve for risks.

    In addition to identifying a software solution with key features, manufacturers should also qualify vendors based on compliance with ISO 13485:2016. Certified companies have a distinct advantage when adopting the MDSAP, as the program’s underlying structure is based on the ISO 13485 standard.

    MDSAP is the new audit reality. Despite its perceived challenges, the benefits of adhering to a global standard outweigh the cons, as long as manufacturers put the time and effort behind adequately training the entire organization and establishing an internal assessment process to help identify risks. To help streamline this process, businesses should consider the value of automated QMS software that can mitigate MDSAP preparedness challenges and deliver greater, long-term audit efficiency—which will be crucial as more countries adopt the MDSAP standard and regulations become increasingly complex. By answering these three questions, medical device manufacturers can diminish the potential for NCs and ensure continual conformity for years to come. 


    Anthony Parise is a product strategist for life sciences at ETQ , a Burlington, Mass.-based leading provider of quality, EHS, and compliance management software trusted by some of the world’s strongest companies to secure brand reputation, transform insight into action, and help them focus on what matters most.
    Related Searches
    • company
    • iso 13485:2016
    • product development
    • data
    Related Knowledge Center
    • Software & IT
    Suggested For You
    Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA)
    S-Y-M Products Company S-Y-M Products Company
    Survival Tips for Third-Party Verification Survival Tips for Third-Party Verification
    Saranas Saranas' Early Bird Bleed Monitoring System Gains De Novo Clearance
    FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb to Step Down FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb to Step Down
    ICU Medical Recalls ChemoLock Vial Spike (20mm) Due to Risk of Detached Plastic Particles ICU Medical Recalls ChemoLock Vial Spike (20mm) Due to Risk of Detached Plastic Particles
    FDA Clears Intuitive Surgical FDA Clears Intuitive Surgical's Lung Cancer Biopsy Robot
    Shimmer Shimmer's Verisense Wearable Provides Biometric Data for Clinical Trials
    Medtronic Medtronic's Personalized Closed Loop Insulin Pump System Wins Breakthrough Status
     ivWatch Extends Patient Monitor to International Markets ivWatch Extends Patient Monitor to International Markets
    The Regulatory Outlook for 2019 The Regulatory Outlook for 2019
    Images from Medica/Compamed 2018, Day 3 Images from Medica/Compamed 2018, Day 3
    Prototypes Enable a Wearable Hypothesis Investigation Prototypes Enable a Wearable Hypothesis Investigation
    6 Best Practices for Complying with ISO 13485:2016 6 Best Practices for Complying with ISO 13485:2016
    Extrapolating Extrusion Extrapolating Extrusion

    Related Buyers Guide Companies

    • Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA)

      ...
      Sheri DeVinney, Director of Operations 11.17.22

    • S-Y-M Products Company

      S-Y-M Products Company

      ...
      Daniel Fowler, Manager 12.01.21

    • Survival Tips for Third-Party Verification

      Survival Tips for Third-Party Verification

      ...
      James A. Dunning, Principal, QPC Services LLC 03.07.19


    • Cardiovascular | Patient Monitoring | Surgical
      Saranas

      Saranas' Early Bird Bleed Monitoring System Gains De Novo Clearance

      First and only device for real-time detection and monitoring of endovascular bleed complications.
      Business Wire 03.06.19

    • FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb to Step Down

      FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb to Step Down

      The 46-year-old physician, former venture capitalist, and drug consultant is due to resign in a month.
      Sam Brusco, Associate Editor 03.05.19

    Loading, Please Wait..

    Trending
    • Healthcare Changes Prompt Medtronic To Merge Sales Force Medtronic, Inc. Is Combining Its U.S. Ca
    • Philips Names New Supervisory Board Chairman
    • A New Approach To Post-Market Surveillance
    • FDA Clears Sanara MedTech's Advanced Surgical Solution
    • Titan Medical Licenses Most IP To Intuitive; CEO Steps Down
    Breaking News
    • CardioRenal’s TENOR Device Receives Breakthrough Device Designation from FDA
    • LifeQ Unveils New 24-Hour Sleep Solution
    • Babson Diagnostics Welcomes New Clinical Advisor, Andrew Carroll
    • EvoEndo Names CEO and Chief Operating Officer
    • Electromedical Products International Forms Scientific Advisory Board
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    May 2023

    • Computer Concepts for Medical Device Design
    • IVD Manufacturers Are Being Put to the Test
    • The New State of Medtech Outsourcing
    • View More >

    Cookies help us to provide you with an excellent service. By using our website, you declare yourself in agreement with our use of cookies.
    You can obtain detailed information about the use of cookies on our website by clicking on "More information”.

    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms And Conditions
    • Contact Us

    follow us

    Subscribe
    Nutraceuticals World

    Latest Breaking News From Nutraceuticals World

    Stefan Pasiakos, PhD, Selected to Lead NIH Office of Dietary Supplements
    Verdure Sciences Receives Award for Sustainable, Ethical Turmeric Sourcing
    BGG Receives Patent for Saw Palmetto ID Method
    Coatings World

    Latest Breaking News From Coatings World

    Teal and Mackrill Director Geoff Mackrill Honored by BCF
    Evonik's TEGO Airex 923 Wins 2023 Ringier Technology Innovation Award
    120 Years HOFFMANN MINERAL - Success Through Innovation and Responsibility
    Medical Product Outsourcing

    Latest Breaking News From Medical Product Outsourcing

    LifeQ Unveils New 24-Hour Sleep Solution
    Babson Diagnostics Welcomes New Clinical Advisor, Andrew Carroll
    EvoEndo Names CEO and Chief Operating Officer
    Contract Pharma

    Latest Breaking News From Contract Pharma

    WuXi Increases Manufacturing Capacity in Germany
    MilliporeSigma Invests €35M in Biosafety Testing in Scotland
    Dragonfly Therapeutics Expands Clinical Leadership Team
    Beauty Packaging

    Latest Breaking News From Beauty Packaging

    L'Oréal North Asia President Discusses China's Consumer Sector Recovery & Premium Beauty Trends
    Kiehl’s Celebrates Pride by Supporting The Trevor Project
    L’Oréal & UNESCO Announce 2023 Laureates of the For Women in Science International Awards
    Happi

    Latest Breaking News From Happi

    Beauty & Wellness Brand Veracity Hires Chief Hormone Officer
    Skincare Brand Three Ships Beauty Expands Retail Partnership With Whole Foods
    Uoma Beauty Founder and CEO Sharon Chuter Steps Down
    Ink World

    Latest Breaking News From Ink World

    WestRock Advances its Commitment to a Sustainable Future
    Roland DGA Announces Key Service Department Personnel Changes
    The 2023 CPIPC Golf Outing is Teeing Off on June 21
    Label & Narrow Web

    Latest Breaking News From Label & Narrow Web

    Appvion announces new, sustainable coatings for label facestocks
    Epson teams with 5 Gyres Institute to battle plastic pollution
    Maxcess opens new facility in India
    Nonwovens Industry

    Latest Breaking News From Nonwovens Industry

    Harper Hygienics Launches Hemp-Based Intimate Care Wipes
    What You’re Reading on Nonwovens-Industry.com
    Biodiapers Signs Agreement with Sicam
    Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Latest Breaking News From Orthopedic Design & Technology

    Augmedics Debuts New Features, Indications for xvision Platform
    Artelon Closes $20M Series B Funding
    Orthofix Unveils Seven-Year Outcome Data for M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc
    Printed Electronics Now

    Latest Breaking News From Printed Electronics Now

    DIC Acquires Photoresist Polymers Manufacturer PCAS Canada
    Arkema Collaborates with Habitat for Humanity Philadelphia
    Vitesco Technologies, onsemi Sign SiC Long-Term Supply Agreement

    Copyright © 2023 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.

    AD BLOCKER DETECTED

    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors.
    Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker.


    FREE SUBSCRIPTION Already a subscriber? Login