09.09.15
Earlier this year, federal health officials laid out extra safety measures hospitals can take to clean specialized medical scopes linked to sometimes deadly bacterial outbreaks across the United States.
However, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials acknowledged in early August that not all hospitals have the staff, expertise and resources to take the steps, including sterilizing scopes with toxic gas to kill bacteria. Even with such steps “the risk of infection transmission cannot be completely eliminated,” the FDA said in an online statement.
Despite the risks of infection, the FDA said the devices should remain available because they benefit “appropriately selected patients.”
Known as duodenoscopes, the scopes consist of a flexible tube and specialized tip that surgeons guide into the digestive tract to diagnose and treat blockages of the bile and pancreatic ducts. They are used in an estimated 500,000 procedures per year.
The FDA came under heavy criticism earlier this year for its oversight of the hard-to-clean devices after two Los Angeles, Calif., hospitals reported patients infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or “superbugs,” despite following manufacturers’ cleaning instructions. According to government figures, there have been eight outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant bacteria linked to the devices at U.S. hospitals since 2013.
Duodenoscopes’ complex design—intended to help physicians drain fluids from the body—also makes the instruments extremely difficult to clean. Bodily fluids and other particles can stay in the device’s crevices even after cleaning and disinfection.
In May, the agency assembled a panel of outside experts to make recommendations for improving the cleaning and design of the instruments. The FDA’s Aug. 4 recommendations reflect the suggestions of those experts and internal agency staff.
Currently most scopes are cleaned manually by hospital staff or automated machines designed to disinfect the instruments. In addition to these steps, the FDA advises hospitals to consider:
The agency also noted that ethylene oxide gas can be dangerous for hospital staff and patients if residue of the toxic gas stays on the scopes after sterilization.
FDA critics, including several members of Congress, have suggested that the instruments be redesigned to reduce risks of infection. The agency previously has said it cannot require manufacturers to redesign their products. But in its early August news release, the agency laid out several design changes that could reduce risks of contamination, including using disposable components for hard-to-clean areas.
“The FDA is currently working with manufacturers as they explore design innovations incorporating these features,” the agency said.
However, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials acknowledged in early August that not all hospitals have the staff, expertise and resources to take the steps, including sterilizing scopes with toxic gas to kill bacteria. Even with such steps “the risk of infection transmission cannot be completely eliminated,” the FDA said in an online statement.
Despite the risks of infection, the FDA said the devices should remain available because they benefit “appropriately selected patients.”
Known as duodenoscopes, the scopes consist of a flexible tube and specialized tip that surgeons guide into the digestive tract to diagnose and treat blockages of the bile and pancreatic ducts. They are used in an estimated 500,000 procedures per year.
The FDA came under heavy criticism earlier this year for its oversight of the hard-to-clean devices after two Los Angeles, Calif., hospitals reported patients infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or “superbugs,” despite following manufacturers’ cleaning instructions. According to government figures, there have been eight outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant bacteria linked to the devices at U.S. hospitals since 2013.
Duodenoscopes’ complex design—intended to help physicians drain fluids from the body—also makes the instruments extremely difficult to clean. Bodily fluids and other particles can stay in the device’s crevices even after cleaning and disinfection.
In May, the agency assembled a panel of outside experts to make recommendations for improving the cleaning and design of the instruments. The FDA’s Aug. 4 recommendations reflect the suggestions of those experts and internal agency staff.
Currently most scopes are cleaned manually by hospital staff or automated machines designed to disinfect the instruments. In addition to these steps, the FDA advises hospitals to consider:
- Performing bacterial testing on scopes that have been cleaned to make sure they are bacteria-free;
- Sterilizing scopes with ethylene oxide gas to kill all bacteria;
- Using additional sterilizing chemicals to kill bacteria; and
- Cleaning scopes multiple times using standard manual or machine-assisted techniques
The agency also noted that ethylene oxide gas can be dangerous for hospital staff and patients if residue of the toxic gas stays on the scopes after sterilization.
FDA critics, including several members of Congress, have suggested that the instruments be redesigned to reduce risks of infection. The agency previously has said it cannot require manufacturers to redesign their products. But in its early August news release, the agency laid out several design changes that could reduce risks of contamination, including using disposable components for hard-to-clean areas.
“The FDA is currently working with manufacturers as they explore design innovations incorporating these features,” the agency said.