• Login
    • Join
  • FOLLOW:
  • Subscribe Free
    • Magazine
    • eNewsletter
    Checkout
    • Magazine
    • News
    • Opinions
    • Top 30
    • Research
    • Supply Chain
    • Device Sectors
    • Directory
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Microsites
    • More
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Opinions
  • Top 30
  • Research
  • Supply Chain
  • Device Sectors
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Microsites
  • Current / Back Issues
    Features
    Editorial
    Digital Edition
    eNewsletter Archive
    Our Team
    Editorial Guidelines
    Reprints
    Subscribe Now
    Advertise Now
    Top Features
    India’s New Medical Devices Rules

    Discovering Packaging’s Hidden Value

    Deliberate Disposal: Single-Use & Disposables Technologies

    Illuminating Tubing’s Future

    Positive Identification: An Examination of Converting, Labeling, and Printing
    OEM News
    Supplier News
    Service / Press Releases
    Online Exclusives
    Press Releases
    People in the News
    Product & Service Releases
    Supplier News
    Technical Features
    International News
    Videos
    Product & Service Releases
    Live From Shows
    Top News
    Siemens Healthineers and Hermes Pardini Group to Create an Unprecedented Automated Lab

    Electrode Shape Improves Neurostimulation for Small Targets

    FDA Approves Hologic's Integrated Imager, Expanding Automated Pap Test Imaging to More Labs

    CE Mark for Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter for Calcified BTK Peripheral Artery Disease

    Paragonix Technologies Appoints Medical Device Veteran to its Board
    From the Editor
    Blogs
    Guest Opinions
    Top Opinions
    India’s New Medical Devices Rules

    Discovering Packaging’s Hidden Value

    Deliberate Disposal: Single-Use & Disposables Technologies

    Illuminating Tubing’s Future

    Positive Identification: An Examination of Converting, Labeling, and Printing
    Top 30 Medical Device Companies
    Top Top 30
    Top 30 Global Medical Device Companies

    1. Medtronic plc

    2. Johnson & Johnson

    3. GE Healthcare

    4. Siemens Healthineers
    Market Data
    Datawatch Column
    Salary Survey
    White Papers
    Top Research
    Extolling the Virtues of Surgical Simulation

    Will Medtech M&A Mania Continue?

    Learn from My Mistakes: Why You Need a Quality System

    Brexit: D-Day or the Y2K for Global Supply Chains?

    Planning for Brexit
    3D/Additive Manufacturing
    Contract Manufacturing
    Electronics
    Machining & Laser Processing
    Materials
    Molding
    Packaging & Sterilization
    R&D & Design
    Software & IT
    Testing
    Tubing & Extrusion
    Cardiovascular
    Diagnostics
    Digital Health
    Neurological
    Patient Monitoring
    Surgical
    All Companies
    Categories
    Company Capabilities
    Add New Company
    Outsourcing Directory
    Teel Plastics

    Currier Plastics Inc.

    Branson

    MTD Micro Molding

    Parker Precision Fluidics Division
    MPO Summit
    Industry Events
    Webinars
    Live From Show Event
    Industry Associations
    Videos
    Career Central
    Slideshows
    Top Resources
    Single-Use Device Reprocessing Tailwinds and Headwinds

    Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Market to Register Commendable 40 Percent CAGR Over 2017-2024

    Finding Talent in Healthcare IoT

    Transforming from Supplier to Partner

    Building a Better Package
    Companies
    News Releases
    Product Releases
    Press Releases
    Product Spec Sheets
    Service Releases
    Case Studies
    White Papers
    Brochures
    Videos
    • Magazine
      • Current/Back Issues
      • Features
      • Editorial
      • Columns
      • Digital Editions
      • Subscribe Now
      • Advertise Now
    • News
    • Directory
      • All Companies
      • ALL CATEGORIES
      • Industry Associations
      • Company Capabilities
      • Add Your Company
    • Supply Chain
      • 3D/Additive Manufacturing
      • Contract Manufacturing
      • Electronics
      • Machining & Laser Processing
      • Materials
      • Molding
      • Packaging & Sterilization
      • R&D & Design
      • Software & IT
      • Testing
      • Tubing & Extrusion
    • Device Sectors
      • Cardiovascular
      • Diagnostics
      • Digital Health
      • Neurological
      • Patient Monitoring
      • Surgical
    • Top 30 Company Report
    • Expert Insights
    • Slideshows
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Infographics
    • Whitepapers
    • Research
      • White Papers
      • Case Studies
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Salary Survey
      • Market Data
      • Datawatch Column
    • MPO Summit
    • Events
      • Industry Events
      • Live From Show Events
      • Webinars
    • Microsite
      • Companies
      • Product Releases
      • Product Spec Sheets
      • Services
      • White Papers / Tech Papers
      • Press Releases
      • Videos
      • Literature / Brochures
      • Case Studies
    • About Us
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise with Us
      • eNewsletter Archive
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use
    Online Exclusives

    Medical Device Adhesives: Specifications and Failure Modes

    Medical devices require careful consideration when choosing adhesives; many factors can affect an adhesive joint's success.

    Related CONTENT
    • 2. Johnson & Johnson
    • Sticky When Wet: Strong Adhesive for Wound Healing
    • Angiplast Private Limited
    • 3M Applies Adhesive Know-How to Improve Wearable Medical Devices
    • FMI Opens New Cleanroom for Silicone Parts
    Nathan Müller, EIT, Mechanical Engineer, StarFish Medical11.02.17
    From silicones and epoxies to acrylic-based adhesives, the world of medical adhesives is broad in its choices and applications. As novel medical treatments and technologies have come forth, medical adhesives have flourished, integrating themselves into the designs of many medical devices. Components with materials that once provided difficulty—catheters, disposables, other compliant materials—are now reliably bonded in production lines with predictable and controlled medical adhesives. In this article, I’ll cover medical device adhesive specifications and failure modes, then outline the benefits of adhesives over fasteners, give insight into biocompatibility requirements, and offer some specific applications based on an adhesive’s type.
     
    Specifications
    To give a broad overview of medical device adhesives, the following table provides context to parameters and the corresponding performance of adhesives.


    When choosing an adhesive, mechanical properties—along with chemical compatibility—are the fundamental factors to consider. Sound design practice, along with proper material and adhesive choices, will set the path towards successful design. Several failure modes and ways to circumvent them are outlined here in order to give clarity and lead to improved design using adhesives.
     
    Failure Modes
    In order to understand why adhesives fail, it is essential to acknowledge their mechanical modes of failure. There are three basic modes of failure, shown and explained below.
     
     
    Adhesive failures are often due to a lack of surface preparation. This failure mode can be mitigated by several methods. Preparation of the substrate’s surface by using abrasives or bead/shot blasting to roughen will give better adhesion and bond strength. Cleanliness of the substrate is also of importance, due to the possibility of machining fluids, lubricants, and leftover materials (e.g., powder) causing adhesion issues. For most applications, degreasing with chemical methods—such as detergents and solvents—can lead to successful adhesion. For materials with lower surface energy, more specialized treatments (e.g., plasma or corona discharge) can enhance bondability.
     
    Cohesive failure can be due to three key reasons. Higher thickness in bonds allows for more deformation in tension and shear, relying on the adhesives’ own strength between its internal bonds. As the thickness increases, the shear stresses increase, and therefore is more likely to lead to a cohesive failure. Mitigate this by following the adhesive’s directions closely, and by design of close fitting parts. Secondly, cohesive failure can be due insufficient bonding time or inadequate methods of curing (e.g., lack of full penetration of curing light). The final reason could simply be due to the maximum strength of the adhesive. Every adhesive will break at given stresses, and so careful planning for the application can allow for good results through a reliable bond. There are a number of factors that come together to create a properly cured adhesive. Following instructions from the adhesive’s manufacturer is key, as well as process control and verification testing, all of which can lead to consistent results for a bond.
     
    Structural failure generally occurs due to stress concentrations created near a bonded joint. As with any material, there is an inherent yield and ultimate strength. Geometries and features of the component can amplify these effects, and lead to structural failure. Part analysis in software can reveal key flags during the design phase, leading to mitigations through design and allowing for an integral bond and part interface. In addition, chemical attack, particularly environmental stress cracking in plastics, can quickly cause structural failures in the base material.
     
    Benefits of Adhesives over Fasteners
    There are significant benefits of using adhesives over mechanical joining systems. This is dependent on the careful design and execution of the bonded joint. If well designed, adhesives can outshine mechanical bonding on several fronts.
     
    Adhesives create a uniform and strong bond between materials by distributing stresses over an area. This reduces stress risers such as those that can occur with screws and rivets. Key to medical devices, adhesives do not require through holes, and can act simultaneously as both a sealant and a joining material. If an adhesive bond is designed as watertight, the area the adhesive covers will be protected from corrosion or liquid ingress. Space requirements are also an important consideration—adhesives can be used in place of fasteners when limited by the size of a joint or fastening region, as they are able to join materials with very limited additional volume. In some cases, a bonded assembly can be more durable than a fastened assembly due to vibration resistance, as adhesive will not loosen as with unsupported fasteners. Adhesives can save time and material cost during assembly, with the possibility of automation for high volumes. Automation, in certain cases, can be faster than with traditional fasteners, depending on the application. Also, depending on the adhesive selected, bonded assemblies can be disassembled through the application of adhesive removal compounds, allowing them to be disassembled alike to fastened assemblies.
     
    Beyond function, the appearance of an assembly can be enhanced by adhesives, due to the absence of visible fasteners. From a risk mitigation standpoint, this also protects the user from device internals. Fasteners can be removed with tools, while most adhesives seal permanently and are arduous to separate.
     
    Biocompatibility
    A material is considered biocompatible if it lacks any negative interaction with living tissues or systems. Biocompatibility of a medical device that comes into human contact is of utmost importance, and should be top of mind during its development stage.
     
    Merits of using adhesives over fasteners can also be applied to biocompatibility testing. By acting to seal parts together, adhesives limit the ingress of fluid into and between parts. This can reduce risk during testing due to less potential material contact (e.g., fluid contacts only external parts of device, thus excluding internals from the scope of biocompatibility testing).
     
    As with all medical device testing, biocompatibility testing and validation is defined by the end use of the product and its component parts. The downselection for required testing involves defining a device category and the nature of bodily contact. Finally, the duration of contact defines further required testing. An important note is that the FDA only approves the final device, and not its component parts or materials. However, medical adhesive vendors can claim certain ISO 10993 or USP compliance by testing their cured adhesive, allowing designers to make the right adhesive choice for their device. These tests can clear a material for a particular application and provide confidence that the adhesive joints in an assembly will be non-toxic.
     
    For further details on testing and requirements, consult biocompatibility standards ISO 10993 and USP series I to VI.
     
    Applications
    Adhesives can be categorized into the following segments:

    • Structural: adhesives with defined load bearing properties, typically chemically curing, resulting in high strength bonds for the most demanding applications.
    • Non-structural: adhesives for uses other than load bearing, typically physically curing (solvent/water evaporation, hot melt), for light-duty or cosmetic applications.
    • Pressure Sensitive: adhesives generally for temporary applications, cured through the application of pressure between two surfaces, primary application—skin-based.

    Understanding the application for a given adhesive and the bond’s mechanical property requirements are crucial to bond joint design. So too are the adhesive types recommended for each application. The table below provides examples of typical materials and applications for a range of structural, non-structural, and pressure sensitive adhesives.
     

    Conclusion
    Medical devices require careful consideration when choosing adhesives. From design of the base part to the application method to the final intended use, many factors can affect the success of an adhesive joint. Prudent and conscious design choices are key factors in determining the success of any medical product.
     
    Adhesives can offer many merits over designing with fasteners. They can provide cost reduction in many cases, and offer another choice to increase flexibility in design. They can be pre-tested by vendors to confirm their compliance with ISO 10993 or USP I to VI and be used to bond and seal between parts. These factors can assist in passing biocompatibility testing of the completed device. Overall, their applications are broad and their use in the medical field will only grow as both device variety and adhesive technologies advance in the years to come.

    Nathan Müller, EIT, is a mechanical engineer at StarFish Medical.
    Related Searches
    • it
    • compliance
    • design
    • standard
    Related Knowledge Center
    • R&D & Design
    • Materials
    Suggested For You
    Quality Nightmares #30 Quality Nightmares #30
    FDA’s Role in Medical Device Cybersecurity FDA’s Role in Medical Device Cybersecurity
    FDA Reaches Agreement with Philips North America Over Quality Control Issues FDA Reaches Agreement with Philips North America Over Quality Control Issues
    FDA Commissioner Declares New Steps to Advance Medical Device Innovation FDA Commissioner Declares New Steps to Advance Medical Device Innovation
    FDA Warns Magellan Diagnostics of Possible Federal Law Violations FDA Warns Magellan Diagnostics of Possible Federal Law Violations
    5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized the Healthcare Industry 5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized the Healthcare Industry
    Packaging Validations—Looking Beyond ISO 11607 Packaging Validations—Looking Beyond ISO 11607
    Master Bond Inc. Master Bond Inc.
    NaviENT Receives FDA 510(K) Clearance NaviENT Receives FDA 510(K) Clearance
    Mike on Medtech: MDUFA IV and Its Impact on Medtech Innovation Mike on Medtech: MDUFA IV and Its Impact on Medtech Innovation
     Find The Right Medical Adhesive Find The Right Medical Adhesive
    Anticipated Changes in Assessing Biocompatibility for Medical Devices Anticipated Changes in Assessing Biocompatibility for Medical Devices
    FDA Warns US Stem Cell Clinic of Significant Deviations FDA Warns US Stem Cell Clinic of Significant Deviations
    An Examination of User Fees’ Impact on Review Times An Examination of User Fees’ Impact on Review Times
    Mike on Medtech: Off-Label Use Mike on Medtech: Off-Label Use

    Related Online Exclusives

    • R&D & Design
      Q&A: 2018 IDSA Medical Design Conference

      Q&A: 2018 IDSA Medical Design Conference

      Dr. Bryce Rutter, chair for this year’s event, addresses several questions regarding the medical design conference.
      Dr. Bryce Rutter, Founder and CEO, Metaphase Design Group 03.20.18

    • Electronics | R&D & Design
      7 Considerations for Designing Medical Device Mechanisms

      7 Considerations for Designing Medical Device Mechanisms

      Mechanisms can be the defining feature of a successful medical device.
      Nigel Syrotuck, Mechanical Engineer, StarFish Medical 02.23.18

    • Electronics | R&D & Design
      When to Design a DC-DC Converter from Scratch

      When to Design a DC-DC Converter from Scratch

      How to decide whether to use an off-the-shelf DC-DC module or design it from scratch for a medical electronic device.
      Kenneth MacCallum, Principal Engineering Physicist, StarFish Medical 01.22.18


    • R&D & Design
      10 Steps to a Successful Product Development Arrangement

      10 Steps to a Successful Product Development Arrangement

      When hiring a product development partner, be sure to address these critical issues during the vendor selection process.
      David C. Robson, Principal, Robson Advisors 12.05.17

    • Materials | Molding
      5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized the Healthcare Industry

      5 Ways Plastics Revolutionized the Healthcare Industry

      Plastics have significantly impacted all industry sectors, but in healthcare, it has made substantial improvements.
      Mohan Naik, Digital Marketing, XL Plastics 10.09.17

    • Cardiovascular | Diagnostics | Digital Health | Neurological | Patient Monitoring | R&D & Design | Surgical
      Proper Design Controls Could Save You $20 Million

      Proper Design Controls Could Save You $20 Million

      Considerations for smaller medical device companies to avoid potentially damaging deficiencies during product development.
      Jon Speer, Founder and VP of QA/RA, greenlight.guru 09.07.17


    • 3D/Additive Manufacturing | Materials
      3D Metal Printing Opportunities in Medical Device Manufacturing

      3D Metal Printing Opportunities in Medical Device Manufacturing

      Technology contributes to the ushering in of personalized medicine in healthcare.
      Ed Potoczak, Director of Industry Relations, IQMS 09.01.17

    • Digital Health | R&D & Design | Software & IT
      5 Medtech Trends Shaping 2017: Cybersecurity

      5 Medtech Trends Shaping 2017: Cybersecurity

      Cybersecurity risks will continue to threaten device innovation.
      Alex Butler, Manager, Medical Device Solutions, MasterControl 08.31.17

    • Cardiovascular | R&D & Design | Surgical | Tubing & Extrusion
      Design Considerations for Using Reinforced Silicone Tube

      Design Considerations for Using Reinforced Silicone Tube

      Solution offers a number of advantages, but designers need to consider the requirements of the specific application.
      Dan Sanchez, R&D Engineering Manager, Principal Engineer, Trelleborg Sealing Solutions 08.10.17


    • Contract Manufacturing | R&D & Design | Software & IT | Testing
      5 Tips to Avoid a Clinical Trial Failure

      5 Tips to Avoid a Clinical Trial Failure

      A failed data strategy in medical device trials can be costly for a number of reasons.
      Paul Fardy, VP of Data Services, CROS NT 08.01.17

    • Diagnostics | Digital Health | Patient Monitoring | R&D & Design | Software & IT
      5 Medtech Trends Shaping 2017: Connected Health and Seniors

      5 Medtech Trends Shaping 2017: Connected Health and Seniors

      An untapped market—Wearables, apps, and other IOT innovations for seniors are becoming more popular.
      Alex Butler, Medical Device Product Manager, MasterControl 06.12.17

    • R&D & Design
      Rethinking Design to Maximize Margins from New Products

      Rethinking Design to Maximize Margins from New Products

      DfX offers an alternative development strategy that leverages the expertise of all design and manufacturing stakeholders.
      Adrienne Trangle-Pelleg, Director, Tefen 04.06.17

    • Contract Manufacturing | Materials | Molding
      The Ins and Outs of LSR Molding for Medtech

      The Ins and Outs of LSR Molding for Medtech

      A technical look at the capital equipment and material properties associated with silicone rubber.
      Tim Erwin, Technical Advisor, NPI/Medical 04.03.17

    • Diagnostics | Digital Health | Electronics | Materials | Patient Monitoring
      Plastic Electronics: Fueling a Healthcare Revolution

      Plastic Electronics: Fueling a Healthcare Revolution

      A look at the medical applications that will be made possible with this technological advance.
      Gerald Law, CEO, InnovationDB 03.31.17

    • Cardiovascular | Diagnostics | Digital Health | Electronics | Neurological | Patient Monitoring | R&D & Design | Surgical
      Collaborative R&D

      Collaborative R&D

      Working with research and development specialists could help make the process more affordable.
      Sean Fenske, Editor 03.02.17


    Breaking News
    • Siemens Healthineers and Hermes Pardini Group to Create an Unprecedented Automated Lab
    • Electrode Shape Improves Neurostimulation for Small Targets
    • FDA Approves Hologic's Integrated Imager, Expanding Automated Pap Test Imaging to More Labs
    • CE Mark for Intravascular Lithotripsy Catheter for Calcified BTK Peripheral Artery Disease
    • Paragonix Technologies Appoints Medical Device Veteran to its Board
    View Breaking News >
    CURRENT ISSUE

    April 2018

    • India’s New Medical Devices Rules
    • Discovering Packaging’s Hidden Value
    • Deliberate Disposal: Single-Use & Disposables Technologies
    • Illuminating Tubing’s Future
    • View More >

    Copyright © 2018 Rodman Media. All rights reserved. Use of this constitutes acceptance of our privacy policy The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Rodman Media.